KSP

The best way to have proper angles in the Start, End and Delta boxes is set into Polars > Define an Analysis > Design Variable section values for min = 0 and max = 1

The best way to have proper angles in the Start, End and Delta boxes is set into Polars > Define an Analysis > Design Variable section values for min = 0 and max = 1

It seems that problem is not in the trailing edge... If this were so, then high aspect ratio surfaces should have relatively greater influence from long trailing edge than low AR surfaces, but my last experiment show exactly opposite behaviour! Now I took flat plates for simplicity - one with high aspect ratio and second with low. As a result: twin High AR plates increased lift just for 5%, but Low AR plates increased lift for more than 50%!!! Maybe problem hides in the tip vortices? They are huge...

It seems that problem is not in the trailing edge... If this were so, then high aspect ratio surfaces should have relatively greater influence from long trailing edge than low AR surfaces, but my last experiment show exactly opposite behaviour! Now I took flat plates for simplicity - one with high aspect ratio and second with low. As a result: twin High AR plates increased lift just for 5%, but Low AR plates increased lift for more than 50%!!! Maybe problem hides in the tip vortices? They are huge...

It seems that problem is not in the trailing edge... If this were so, then high aspect ratio surfaces should have relatively greater influence from long trailing edge than low AR surfaces, but my last experiment show exactly opposite behaviour! Now I took flat plates for simplicity - one with high aspect ratio and second with low. As a result: twin High AR plates increased lift just for 5%, but Low AR plates increased lift for more than 50%!!! Maybe problem hides in the tip vortices? They are huge...

It seems that problem is not in the trailing edge... If this were so, then high aspect ratio surfaces should have relatively greater influence from long trailing edge than low AR surfaces, but my last experiment show exactly opposite behaviour! Now I took flat plates for simplicity - one with high aspect ratio and second with low. As a result: twin High AR plates increased lift just for 5%, but Low AR plates increased lift for more than 50%!!! Maybe problem hides in the tip vortices? They are huge...

It seems that problem is not in the trailing edge... If this were so, then high aspect ratio surfaces should have relatively greater influence from long trailing edge than low AR surfaces, but my last experiment show exactly opposite behaviour! Now I took flat plates for simplicity - one with high aspect ratio and second with low. As a result: twin High AR plates increased lift just for 5%, but Low AR plates increased lift for more than 50%!!! Maybe problem hides in the tip vortices? They are huge...