krazzz

Hi, Dunno if it is a bug, a feature or just unwanted behaviour: In preferences, I have ticked "wipe cached passwords on exit". When I then close the GUI (with the cross in upper right corner), cache is wiped (although Veracrypt is still running in the background, containers still mounted). To me, this is the intended behaviour of "wipe cached passwords on exit". But then there is you can assign a hotkey to "Show/Hide the MainVeracrypt Window". When pressing associated hotkey, GUI closes, while Veracrypt...

Hi, Dunno if it is a bug, a feature or just unwanted behaviour: In preferences, I have ticked "wipe cached passwords on exit". When I then close the GUI (with the cross in upper right corner), cache is wiped (although Veracrypt is still running in the background, containers still mounted). To me, this is the intended behaviour of "wipe cached passwords on exit". But then there is you can assign a hotkey to "Show/Hide the MainVeracrypt Window". When pressing associated hotkey, GUI closes, while Veracrypt...

For the CLI, the /silent flag disables all warnings. Is it possible to only silence specific warnings, such as "this container is already mounted" warning, while all other prompts/warnings are still shown when applicable? thnx EDIT: thnx mods for the move to the correct subforum

For the CLI, the /silent flag disables all warnings. Is it possible to only silence specific warnings, such as "this container is already mounted" warning, while all other prompts/warnings are still shown when applicable? thnx (oops, wrong subforum, was supposed to be at Feature Request :| can a mod move this topic over there? can't see how I could delete or move it myself )

For the CLI, the /silent flag disables all warnings. Is it possible to only silence specific warnings, such as "this container is already mounted" warning, while all other prompts/warnings are still shown when applicable? thnx

Hi, Once a dynamic volume has been created and filled to the last byte, will it then be as safe and efficient as a normal volume? I'm asking because when creating such a spare-file-hosted volume (on windows) it will warn for a drop in performance and security; will those issues persist once it is filled to the brim? Thanks, Krazzz

Hi, veracrypt doesn't recognize my hardware acceleration for AES. It used to, IIRC, but not anymore. My processor is an intel-core i5-9400 (which does have hardware acceleration according to intel: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/search.html?charset=UTF-8&q=i5-9400 ) How can this be fixed? thanks in advance Krazzz

When running the Benchmark (under Tools) it says that Hardware-acceleration AES is "N/A". Settings>performance and Driver options also says that the CPU does not support AES hardware acceleration. The benchmark also determines that AES is slower than Twofish and sometimes Serpent and Camellia as well, at about 1.2GB/s. This used to be about 8 GB/s when I bought this computer new, about 6 months ago, when it did support hardware-acceleration for AES (if my memory serves me correct. I think so, because...