thx, that's a relief. Let's hope a release pops up soon, because basically to me 2.15.0 is of no use. Mistakes happen, so looking forward to the maintenance release.
I used to have the following (little snippet) during the install phase: -- Installing: /opt/cppcheck/bin/cppcheck -- Installing: /opt/cppcheck/share/Cppcheck/addons/init.py -- Installing: /opt/cppcheck/share/Cppcheck/addons/cppcheck.py -- Installing: /opt/cppcheck/share/Cppcheck/addons/cppcheckdata.py -- Installing: /opt/cppcheck/share/Cppcheck/addons/findcasts.py -- Installing: /opt/cppcheck/share/Cppcheck/addons/misc.py -- Installing: /opt/cppcheck/share/Cppcheck/addons/misra.py -- Installing:...
* compiler : support for the c++ standards 23 and 26 (and their gnu extensions
Can a new release be made, since we are building this in an automated way, and would want to avoid that I need to adjust the build script to 'sed' a solution ;-) (for the version issue) This was my analysis, just for reference, since problem is solved in the meantime. The problem is cmake/versions.cmake SET(VERSION "2.11") STRING(REGEX MATCHALL "[0-9]+" VERSION_PARTS "${VERSION}") LIST(GET VERSION_PARTS 0 VERSION_MAJOR) LIST(GET VERSION_PARTS 1 VERSION_MINOR) LIST(GET VERSION_PARTS 2 VERSION_PATCH)...
also with cmake 3.26.4. The problem is cmake/versions.cmake SET(VERSION "2.11") STRING(REGEX MATCHALL "[0-9]+" VERSION_PARTS "${VERSION}") LIST(GET VERSION_PARTS 0 VERSION_MAJOR) LIST(GET VERSION_PARTS 1 VERSION_MINOR) LIST(GET VERSION_PARTS 2 VERSION_PATCH) <========== there is no 3rd field So as suggested above changing to "2.11.0" fixes the problem. Cmake error : CMake Error at cmake/versions.cmake:6 (LIST): LIST index: 2 out of range (-2, 1) Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:13...
as described in the other ticket, I think -Wextra should return, this is sticking our head in the ground and lowering the quality checks on the code base
but that is the thing we do not want to do, -Wextra is there to increase the warning level and catch mistakes, disabling it all is like sticking our head in the ground and throw away all the benefits. the -isystem will just shut up those warnings on headers from that include path
-isystem : why would that not be acceptable ?
applied do we keep this open for the follow up discussion on CC_NO_COLLAPSE_ITEM ?
* applied patch #1061 Fix Symbol Browser compilation when CC_NO_COLLAPSE_ITEM is undefined; thanks Miguel Gimenez
I will apply this patch, but the CC_NO_COLLAPSE_ITEM subject remains open.
what's the status, since the build is still broken due to this ?
for me this problem is already like years for this (linux), indeed very annoying.
* add support for upcoming standard C++20 and upcoming gcc 10
* add support for upcoming standard C++20 and upcoming gcc 10
I could build CB with wx 3.1.3 with this change
it seems for wx 3.1.3 I could build without this change
Plugin source_exporter compile fix for wx-master
are we going to update the wxPdfDocument ?
ensure you have setup you compiler corectly, C/C++ headers can include others, so well possible that stdio is including math for example. It seems to point then in the direciton that your compiler, or include paths are not setup correctly ?
this is completely invalid syntax : include <stdio.h></stdio.h> C/C++ is not html. I would suggest you read a book on C/C++ first ;-)
ok, will the breaking change then be reverted ?
any decision yet, so we can lift the broken wx30 linux boxes. Or do we say we drop wx 3.0, and move to wx 3.1.x ? Which is indeed a development version, but at this pace of wx releases I am afraid wx 3.2 might come in like 10 years :-(
- wx3111 build fix for switcherdlg
* compiler : add support for -std=c++17 flag
- back to default no bundle
* version: bumped to 17.12
* setup: bumped to 17.12
correct name for wx dll and version number
* compiler : add support for the following opti...
CCtest : build fix : -std=gnu++11
* correct some regular expressions for compiler...
* gcc and clang : support -std=c++14
I will but ... Warning: Your permissions have been limited until you verify your...
When for example one has a project which is a static library, there could for example...
the example above is a free method, but the same happens on the public classes of...
While trying to reproduce an issue, I however got a lot of those : <error file="bar.h"...
While trying to reproduce an issue, I however got a lot of those : <error file="bar.h"...
When for example one has a project which is a static library, there could for example...
consider the following header file (it has been completely stripped from other stuff,...
Build failure with gcc 5 and C++11 (nullptr macros incorrect)
should be fixed in rev 10253. Can you verify please ?
* Ticket 166 Build failure with gcc 5 and C++11...
patch Doxyblocks-unix.cbp file, thanks Tim
* correct static library command for clang
final and override back in the lexer for colorc...
- -fpermissive