Thank you sir, this fixed my problem. No manual or guide I could find mentioned this. Perhaps the official manual deserves an update :) Regarding the number of found violations, if I call it with just --addon=misra, it will find 7 violations, but when called with --addon=misra-custom.json, where the json file specifies a "rule-texts" file, it will find 10. And all of the new ones are different rules on the same lines as the previously found ones. Also I tried to fix a violation from one line the...
Thank you. No manual or guide I could find mentioned this. Perhaps the official manual deserves an update :) Regarding the number of found violations, if I call it with just --addon=misra, it will find 7 violations, but when called with --addon=misra-custom.json, where the json file specifies a "rule-texts" file, it will find 10. And all of the new ones are different rules on the same lines as the previously found ones. Also I tried to fix a violation from one line the first output, and then it started...
I have just installed version 2.17.1 from the source, and it's still the same. Am I doing something wrong here? If it was a bug I don't suppose it would go unnoticed for so many releases.
Hi, I just updated cppcheck to version 2.13.0 (from 1.90), and it does not report any MISRA violations any more. Using this command: cppcheck --addon=misra misra-test.c misra-test.c is my custom test file with the following contents: #include <stdint.h> #include "file//.h" #define TEST 34566l const char *s41_1 = "\x41g"; int main( const int argc, const char* argv ) { char c[2][2] = { 1, 2, 3, 4 }; int ret = 10; /* // */ return ret; } cppcheck version 1.90 reported 5 violations in it, but cppcheck...
'BW' is self-explanatory, but 'oct' isn't. It didn't occur to me that it would be related (even though it came immediately after 'BW').
Thanks, I will report that.
Changing oct to Oct fixed it. Thanks for the tip. I have also found the log, but it wasn't very helpful: 2024-05-10 15:26:24.048 6964 4B0EFB20 (C:\Eigene Dateien\Entwickl\EqualizerAPO\trunk\filters\BiQuadFilterFactory.cpp:174): No Q or bandwidth given in filter string PEQ Fc 6040 Hz Gain 15.00 dB BW oct 0.500
Hi, I have followed the Wiki manual, measured the room response, set up custom filter in REW, exported to a txt file, and added the file to the config.txt in EqAPO. EqAPO seems to be seeing the included txt file, but does not respect it at all. The sound does not change, and the analysis panel line is totally flat regardless whether the included txt filter is enabled or not. If I change something in the manual filter, the sound changes fine, and the analysis line reflects it, but not for the included...