Activity for jwill42
-
jwill42 modified a comment on discussion Help
I cannot control whether other people get upset. I just state the facts and correct...
-
I cannot control whether other people get upset. I just state the facts and correct...
-
Actually, if you had not made the stupid claim in the first place, then it would...
-
"Ruining" the thread? I simply corrected your mistake. And the stupid claim absolutely...
-
I stopped reading the nonsense of Oblivious John after the first paragraph. You are...
-
I stopped reading your nonsense after the first paragraph. You are still wrong. You...
-
I think semantics matter a bit, since I misunderstood your previous point until you...
-
Why do you say that putting a large static file on a data drive is "less strict"...
-
therealjmc: You seem to have missed the point. The suggestion which is stupid is...
-
Whatever you say, Oblivious David. Just as long as you stop telling other people...
-
David: You really need to stop telling other people what to do when you so obviously...
-
David: You really need to stop telling other people what to do when you so obviously...
-
David: You really need to stop telling other people what to do when you so obviously...
-
I am willing and able to explain, and I ALREADY DID EXPLAIN IN THIS VERY THREAD....
-
I am willing and able to explain, and I ALREADY DID EXPLAIN IN THIS VERY THREAD....
-
No, I already explained in this thread. This is not rocket science. But it seems...
-
Already explained.
-
No, it is NOT "a match from heaven". It is stupid beyond belief.
-
I do not think it is a good idea to suggest putting a temporary download directory...
-
I do not think it is a good idea to suggest putting a temporary download directory...
-
No, a hard drive does not operate differently based on the data stored on it. While...
-
No, a hard drive does not operate differently based on the data stored on it. While...
-
No, a hard drive does not operate differently based on the data stored on it. While...
-
No, a hard drive does not operate differently based on the data stored on it. While...
-
No, a hard drive does not operate differently based on the data stored on it. While...
-
No, a hard drive does not operate differently based on the data stored on it. While...
-
Since the mapping of the files to the SnapRAID blocks is defined in the content file,...
-
Since the configuration of the blocks is defined in the content file, it is not unexpected...
-
It depends. Frequently changed usually means, frequent in comparison to how often...
-
It depends. Frequently changed usually means, frequent in comparison to how often...
-
Just make two separate config files. Name them whatever you like. Then, whenever...
-
How is this useful to know? I mean, why would a user want to know what is the ratio...
-
Unfortunately, you are wrong again. You need to read your definition more carefully...
-
I'll be glad to drop it when Luna stops posting incorrect information.
-
No, just label it what it is: Blocks or Data Blocks.
-
Wrong yet again. And you flip flop yet again, denying that you have repeatedly tried...
-
Wrong yet again. And you flip flop yet again, denying that you have repeatedly tried...
-
You persist in posting nonsense. You have repeatedly claimed in this thread, in nearly...
-
You persist in posting nonsense. You have repeatedly claimed in this thread, in nearly...
-
Why does SnapRAID get the CPU usage wrong? Here is a screenshot showing an example....
-
So you are no longer claiming that you want to label the data blocks as "parity"?...
-
Are you on drugs?
-
Every post.
-
You persist in posting nonsense. You have repeatedly called data blocks "parity",...
-
You persist in posting nonsense. It is completely absurd to call the data drives...
-
This is not a matter of opinion on which you can disagree. You are simply incorrect....
-
This is not a matter of opinion on which you can disagree. You are simply incorrect....
-
No, that is incorrect. It is the size of the blocks allocated for that data drive....
-
Please stop misrepresenting what I am saying. I certainly do not agree with the misleading...
-
Please stop misrepresenting what I am saying. I certainly do not agree with the misleading...
-
Please stop misrepresenting what I am saying. I surely do not agree with the misleading...
-
No, do not put words in my mouth. I said exactly what I meant. You continue to mislead...
-
By the way, there is one thing we certainly agree on. The actual parity file(s) size...
-
We just discussed this in the other thread. At no time in that thread did I propose...
-
We just discussed this in the other thread. At no time in that thread did I propose...
-
We just discussed this in the other thread. At no time in that thread did I propose...
-
Or, the actual correct label would be "Blocks" I'll clarify the misinterpretation....
-
Or, the actual correct label would be "Blocks" I'll clarify the misinterpretation....
-
Or, the actual correct label would be "Blocks" I'll clarify the misinterpretation....
-
Or, the actual correct label would be "Blocks"
-
Or, the correct label would be "Blocks"
-
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Leifi Plomeros mrleifi@users.sf.net wrote: I think...
-
There definitely should NOT be a column labeled "Parity" since that extremely misleading....
-
By the way, the status report includes counts for "Fragmented files" and "Excess...
-
By the way, the status report includes counts for "Fragmented files" and "Excess...
-
By the way, the status report includes counts for "Fragmented files" and "Excess...
-
I don't see how giving a count of files, hardlinks, symlinks, and empty directories...
-
I don't see how giving a count of files, hardlinks, symlinks, and empty directories...
-
Then I hope you will be watching this forum more closely and responding to more of...
-
I don't know. But you could always try it and then run a read-only command like "status"...
-
I think snapraid status should be changed so that the output is the same as snapraid...
-
I think snapraid status should be changed so that the output is the same as snapraid...
-
I think a useful feature for SnapRAID to have would be an option that can ignore...
-
I think a useful feature for SnapRAID to have would be an option that can ignore...
-
I also find that output misleading, but I am not certain how to improve it. I think...
-
I don't think so. That has the same problem as "Wasted". It is only the Parity size...
-
Note that your "Used" + "Wasted" for d2 is 2728.6 GiB = 2929811940966 bytes = 2.93...
-
I also find that output misleading, but I am not certain how to improve it. I think...
-
I also find that output misleading, but I am not certain how to improve it. I think...
-
How many bytes is the parity file? Actual size in bytes. You say 3.1TB. Is it 3,1xx,xxx,xxx,xxx...
-
There is a way to get SnapRAID to tell you which files to delete when the parity...
-
Actually, I believe SnapRAID can shrink the parity file if the blocks from the deleted...
-
Actually, I believe SnapRAID can shrink the parity file if the blocks from the deleted...
-
Also, RAID 1 cannot be as easily grown to parity RAID as can a SnapRAID configuration...
-
I meant to ask for the verbose output of status: snapraid -v status. But I already...
-
I meant to ask for the verbose output of status: snapraid -v status. But I already...
-
Post the output of snapraid status and we might be able to give you more detailed...
-
What does snapraid status show? Mine shows: 8152 files 168066739 blocks 0 hardlinks...
-
What does snapraid status show? Mine shows: 8152 files 168066739 blocks 0 hardlinks...
-
Everything you have asked is covered in the FAQ or the manual.
-
The forum link from the SnapRAID web page is broken. It is not just you. Andrea should...
-
Isn't there a bigger risk of the data block to contain a bit flip before the checksum...
-
In my opinion, the biggest concern with data integrity for SnapRAID is the fact that...
-
In my opinion, the biggest concern with data integrity for SnapRAID is the fact that...
-
Sure, I suggest search terms "self lobotomy" :-)
-
I understand that. The thing is, I just handed him the information he needed to compute...
-
If you want a number, why don't you compute it?
-
SnapRAID maintains a 128-bit hash for every block (default 256KiB) of data, so the...
-
SnapRAID maintains a 128-bit hash for every block (default 256KiB) of data, so the...
-
deuche bag ? Is that the Deutsch version of a douche bag? :-)
1 >
