Hari Tummala

Thanks Jim! I have configured the rule in the custom schema (attached the file in previous comment). Not sure if that will be sufficient or not :( Regarding the filter, I am using the same syntax, i didn't noticed any change. is my inmemory server setting are all good? private static InMemoryDirectoryServer ds; protected static void startInMemoryServer() { InMemoryDirectoryServerConfig config = null; try { config = new InMemoryDirectoryServerConfig( "dc=corp,dc=com"); config.addAdditionalBindCredentials("uid=admin,ou=system",...

Thanks Jim! I have configured the rule in the custom schema (attached the file in previous comment). Not sure if that will be suffice or not :( Regarding the filter, I am using the same syntax, i didn't noticed any change. is my inmemory server setting are all good? private static InMemoryDirectoryServer ds; protected static void startInMemoryServer() { InMemoryDirectoryServerConfig config = null; try { config = new InMemoryDirectoryServerConfig( "dc=corp,dc=com"); config.addAdditionalBindCredentials("uid=admin,ou=system",...

Thanks Jim! I have configured the rule in the custom schema (attached the file in previous comment). Not sure if that will be suffice or not :( Regarding the filter, I am using the same syntax, i didn't noticed any change. is my inmemory server setting are all good? private static InMemoryDirectoryServer ds; protected static void startInMemoryServer() { InMemoryDirectoryServerConfig config = null; try { config = new InMemoryDirectoryServerConfig( "dc=corp,dc=com"); config.addAdditionalBindCredentials("uid=admin,ou=system",...

Thanks Jim! I have configured the rule in the custom schema (attached the file in previous comment). Not sure if that will be suffice or not :( Regarding the filter, I am using the same syntax, i didn't noticed any change.

I am using unboundid-ldapsdk 4.0.9 as an inmemory server for integration testing. I am using the below systax to retrive all inactive user accounts: Filter f = Filter.createExtensibleMatchFilter( "userAccountControl", "1.2.840.113556.1.4.803", false, "2"); LDAPConnection conn = getConn(); SearchResult searchResult = conn.search("dc=corp,dc=com", SearchScope.SUB, f); This brings zero results. But other filters works well! Enty in ldif file: dn: cn=userone,ou=Users,dc=corp,dc=com objectclass: top objectclass:...

I am using unboundid sdk as an inmemory server for integration testing. I am using the below systax to retrive all inactive user accounts: Filter f = Filter.createExtensibleMatchFilter( "userAccountControl", "1.2.840.113556.1.4.803", false, "2"); LDAPConnection conn = getConn(); SearchResult searchResult = conn.search("dc=corp,dc=com", SearchScope.SUB, f); This brings zero results. But other filters works well! Enty in ldif file: dn: cn=userone,ou=Users,dc=corp,dc=com objectclass: top objectclass:...

I am using unboundid sdk as an inmemory server for integration testing. I am using the below systax to retrive all inactive user accounts: Filter f = Filter.createExtensibleMatchFilter( "userAccountControl", "1.2.840.113556.1.4.803", false, "2"); LDAPConnection conn = getConn(); SearchResult searchResult = conn.search("dc=corp,dc=com", SearchScope.SUB, f); This brings zero results. But other filters works well! Enty in ldif file: dn: cn=userone,ou=Users,dc=corp,dc=com objectclass: top objectclass:...

I am using unboundid sdk as an inmemory server for integration testing. I am using the below systax to retrive all inactive user accounts: Filter f = Filter.createExtensibleMatchFilter( "userAccountControl", "1.2.840.113556.1.4.803", false, "2"); LDAPConnection conn = getConn(); SearchResult searchResult = conn.search("dc=corp,dc=com", SearchScope.SUB, f); This brings zero results. But other filters works well! Enty in ldif file: dn: cn=userone,ou=Users,dc=corp,dc=com objectclass: top objectclass:...