Freya

Thanks for your reply! it has really cleared things up for me!!!

Thanks again for your reply! Our neurofeedback training protocol only collected EEG signals from the central zone (Fz/FC1/FC2/FCz/Cz). For this aspect, regression analysis may be more suitable for us. As you said, any method has the potential to increase noise when removing EOG artefacts. If we still use the regression approach, we report (Fig 3 [1]) and (Fig 4, [1]. ) via a pre-experiment , is this convincing enough? I meant to report only how many EOG artifacts were removed from the EEG data, not...

Thanks again for your reply! Our neurofeedback training protocol only collected EEG signals from the central zone (Fz/FC1/FC2/FCz/Cz). For this aspect, regression analysis may be more suitable for us. As you said, any method has the potential to increase noise when removing EOG artefacts. If we still use the regression approach, we report (Fig 3 [1]) and (Fig 4, [1]. ) via a pre-experiment , is this convincing enough?

Thanks so much for your suggestion – it's really helpful! We're currently using the Brain Products system to collect EEG data, and gathering EOG data through a ground electrode (AFz) and a subocular channel. Our main goal is to analyze aperiodic neural activity through real-time signal processing. However, as you anticipated, in the process of removing the ocular artifacts, we also ended up removing some of the aperiodic neural activity (the 1/f fit gave us negative values, which is unusual). We...

Thanks so much for your suggestion – it's really helpful! We're currently using the Brain Products system to collect EEG data, and gathering EOG data through a ground electrode (AFz) and a subocular channel. Our main goal is to analyze aperiodic neural activity through real-time signal processing. However, as you anticipated, in the process of removing the ocular artifacts, we also ended up removing some of the aperiodic neural activity (the 1/f fit gave us negative values). We tried adjusting the...

Hello, Alois！We are currently engaged in the process of designing a neurofeedback training protocol. We would like to process the 5 channels of the central area online, and we think that it would be better to use linear regression to remove eye movement artefacts. We found your article published in 2007 demonstrated in detail the computational process and advantages of this method (Schlögl et al., 2007) and its use in biosig (Vidaurre et al., 2011). Our questions now are: 1, we added the biosig plugin...

Hello, Alois！We are currently engaged in the process of designing a neurofeedback training protocol. We would like to process the 5 channels of the central area online, and we think that it would be better to use linear regression to remove eye movement artefacts. We found your article published in 2005 demonstrated in detail the computational process and advantages of this method (Schlögl et al., 2007) and its use in biosig (Vidaurre et al., 2011). Our questions now are: 1, we added the biosig plugin...