Activity for Frank Wall
-
Frank Wall modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion
hi, not really. It is quite annoying and not really stable to i.e. integrate .NET 4.0 in a WinPE system :(. It looks easier to compile the Keepass 1.x sources to a real 64bit application. By the way, for a 64bit PE it also needs a real 64bit application. The mixed variant 32/64 from VS is not running, because the decision in startup is 32bit and exceuted by WOW64, which is not available under 64bit PE. And finally .Net will not run under PE 64bit, because of needed WOW64 :( regards Frank
-
hi, not really. It is quite annoying and not really stable to i.e. integrate .NET 4.0 in a WinPE system :(. It looks easier to compile the Keepass 1.x sources to a real 64bit application. By the way, for a 64bit PE it also needs a real 64bit application. The mixed variant 32/64 from VS is not running, because the decision in startup is 32bit and exceuted by WOW64, which is not available under 64bit PE... regards Frank
-
hi, not really. It is quite annoying and not really stable to i.e. integrate .NET 4.0 in a WinPE system :(. It looks easier to compile the Keepass 1.x sources to a real 64bit application... regards Frank
-
but not on Win PE64, there is no WOW64 system available. Therfore you need a real 64bit version.... Frank
-
Hi, is there a real 64bit version available from Keepass 1.x, which will run under Win10 PE 64bit? I would need this for a 64bit uefi pc, which only boots with a 64bit pe version... regards Frank
-
Hi, is there a real 64bit version available from Keepass 1.x, which will run under Win10 PE 64bit? regards Frank
1
