"Or later" clause: If a GPLv2 license includes the "or later" clause, then developers can choose to use the terms of GPLv3 for their software.
Same request here.
Your used blocks must be within the partition boundary in the destination partition. Obviously this is the key. How about an option to use the same process as GParted to move all blocks in a partition to the start of the partition before cloning so it could optionally be restored to a smaller partition (say used blocks + 10%)? At least a test if any blocks were outside of the destination partition would be useful. Note FAQs: https://drbl.org/faq/fine-print.php?path=./2_System/25_restore_larger_disk_to_smaller_one.faq#25_restore_larger_disk_to_smaller_one.faq...
Your used blocks must be within the partition boundary in the destination partition. Obviously this is the key. How about an option to use the same process as GParted to move all blocks in a partition to the start of the partition before cloning so it could optionally be restored to a smaller partition (say used blocks + 10%)? At least a test if any blocks were outside of the destination partition would be useful.
pay-> part Sounds like another clone to smaller drive.
http://clonezilla.org/ Limitations: ... Recovery Clonezilla live with multiple CDs or DVDs is not implemented yet. Now all the files have to be in one CD or DVD if you choose to create the recovery iso file. Another service must be able to break the file up into DVDs.
http://clonezilla.org/ Limitations: ... Recovery Clonezilla live with multiple CDs or DVDs is not implemented yet. Now all the files have to be in one CD or DVD if you choose to create the recovery iso file.
Your used blocks must be within the partition boundary in the destination partition. Obviously this is the key. Why can't the same technique be used as in disk defragmentation to relocate used sectors? How about an option to move all blocks in a partition to the start of the partition before cloning so it could be restored to a smaller partition? At least a test if any blocks were outside of the destination partition would be useful.
Your used blocks must be within the partition boundary in the destination partition. Obviously this is the key. Why can't the same technique be used as in disk defragmentation to relocate used sectors? At least a test if any blocks were outside of the destination partition would be useful.
Your used blocks must be within the partition boundary in the destination partition. Obviously this is the key. Why can't the same technique be used as in disk defragmentation to relocate used sectors? At least a test if any blocks were outside of the destination parttion would be useful.
Your used blocks must be within the partition boundary in the destination partition. Obviously this is the key. Why can't the same technique be used as in disk defragmentation to relocate used sectors? At least a test if any blocks were outside of the destiantion parttion would be useful.
Your used blocks must be within the partition boundary in the destination partition. Obviously this is the key. Why can't the same technique be used as in disk defragmentation to relocate used sectors?
Your used blocks must be within the partition boundary in the destination partition. Obviously this is the key. Why can't the same technique be used as in disk defragmentatio to relocate used sectors?
I appreciate the various comments. https://sourceforge.net/p/partclone/wiki/Home/: "Partclone provide utilities to back up used blocks ..." My test Disk is 95% unused blocks. The backup size and backup/restore speed is consistent with only used blocks being stored/restored. Assuming the File Allocation Table (or other relevant facility addressing partition contents) can be adjusted for relocated sectors I am confident that restoring all of first partition and reducing size of second partition should...
My question certainly wasn't answered In an active community I'd expect people with expertise other than the developer The situation is fairly common I posted an example that I thought should work but I felt needed more information (ie -icds and -k2 on a drive using 20GB of 500GB - so nearly all empty blocks but not enough description for using -k2)
Clonezilla seems like a good product but the forum activity indicates it is end-of-life. https://sourceforge.net/p/clonezilla/discussion/Clonezilla_live/thread/f2ea15df/#a686
Any thoughts?
I am trying to Clone 500GB HDD with Win10 (about 50GB used on main partition) to 120GB SSD (testing with 120GB HDD). Using LiveCD -k1 ... Create partition table proportionally I think I need to truncate second partition. How? <sda-pt.parted> Model: ATA ST3500413AS (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 976773168s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Disk Flags: Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 2048s 1026047s 1024000s primary ntfs boot 2 1026048s 976771071s 975745024s primary...
I am trying to Clone 500GB HDD with Win10 (about 50GB used on main partition) to 120GB SSD (testing with 120GB HDD). Using LiveCD -k1 ... Create partition table proportionally I think I need to truncate second partition. How? <sda-pt.parted> Model: ATA ST3500413AS (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 976773168s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Disk Flags: Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 2048s 1026047s 1024000s primary ntfs boot 2 1026048s 976771071s 975745024s primary...
I am trying to Clone 500GB HDD with Win10 (about 50GB used on main partition) to 120GB SSD (testing with 120GB HDD). Using LiveCD -k1 ... Create partition table proportionally I think I need to truncate second partition. How? <sda-pt.parted> Model: ATA ST3500413AS (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 976773168s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Disk Flags: Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 2048s 1026047s 1024000s primary ntfs boot 2 1026048s 976771071s 975745024s primary...
I am trying to Clone 500GB HDD with Win10 (about 50GB used on main partition) to 120GB SSD (testing with 120GB HDD). Using LiveCD -k1 ... Create partition table proportionally I think I need to truncate second partition. How? sda-pt.parted Model: ATA ST3500413AS (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 976773168s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Disk Flags: Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 2048s 1026047s 1024000s primary ntfs boot 2 1026048s 976771071s 975745024s primary...
There is no Map Support File (cvg_map.msf) in Mobac. For implementation see: htt...
Note - Most of this information is user input. It would be good to add 'IMAGE_BB=???'...
It would be good to add 'IMAGE_BB=???' to cvg_map.msf for bounding box.
Map Details not Dosplayed Correctly for Magellan RMP Maps