FFS_User

KeePass ver 2.44 Subject: Modfied date stamp in windows file manager This is a minor thing once I determined what it was doing but just wanted to confirm this is the way it functions and I'm not missing another setting somewhere. Settings in Options->Tools->Interface [x] Disable Save if DB not modified This still leaves Save disabled if entry deleted and somehow even though the entry is in fact deleted, the DB file modified date stamp remains unchanged even with Auto Save On (see below) Settings...

It just got even more weird, while I'm logged in here to Sourceforge (which has a different login pswd) I clicked the http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php?action=login2 in my above post and it took me to http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php and it's showing my Codeblocks username now (not my sourceforge), but I still get a not found popup if I try to click a thread. So I'm logged int there while I'm logged in here but still not able to see anything there except my user name. Crazy stuff. Would...

Codeblocks Forum links Broke

Thanks, the x86 premise of bit width went right over my head here. But after reading your extended explanation it really cleared up my confusion on ARM, risc and cisc. I am definitely going to try the install at https://www.msys2.org/ and put it in a separate base folder. As far as my current Installed Gcc, I sense I've hobbled it by choosing x86/64 which I know now is 64 bit only. I have some old apps that use exception handling which is why I chose the win32 (thread) option over Posix. But I'm...

THANKS, (sorry my ISP was down yesterday) So if on install I had chosen i686 instead of x86/64 it would have put the 32 bit libs (?). The x86/64 seemed to indicate both target options to me. I'm looking around for 32bit libs to match my gcc version but so far not really sure where or which. My gcc installed version is gcc (x86_64-win32-seh-rev0, Built by MinGW-W64 project) 8.1.0 But in any case I am going to install a 32bit target version of MingW to a separate base folder.

WHAT I'M WORKING WITH * I mostly write small work apps for windows, but future might be different. My recent Gcc install was from, https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/mingw-w64/mingw-w64-release/... The file downloaded was "mingw-w64-install.exe" Install Version, gcc --version gcc (x86_64-win32-seh-rev0, Built by MinGW-W64 project) 8.1.0 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Install choices chosen, Architecture chose x86/64 (over the i686) Threads I chose the, win32 (over...

WHAT I'M WORKING WITH * I mostly write small work apps for windows, but future might be different. My recent Gcc install was from, https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/mingw-w64/mingw-w64-release/... The file downloaded was "mingw-w64-install.exe" Install Version, gcc --version gcc (x86_64-win32-seh-rev0, Built by MinGW-W64 project) 8.1.0 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Install choices chosen, Architecture chose x86/64 (over the i686) Threads I chose the, win32 (over...

`Ok thanks again, there it said In order to indicate that the search string is a regular expression, enclose it in '//'. But I seem to missing something in my reading of the syntax, maybe you can point me where. I've attached the db file I used, (named KeePass Search Exp2.kdbx), it's password is password. In Find with ["] I get hits in entries 1 and 3. But in the quick search I got no hits with any of the below. with '/"/' and did not work. with '/ " /' did not work with '/ \" /' did not work with...