Robert Falkenberg

Hello, as I said in my last post, if I move the following options shared-network NAME { ... subnet x.y.z.zz netmask 255.255.255.0 { ... option rfc3442-classless-static-routes 19 , 172 , 27 , 0 , 10 , 20 , 30 , 40; option ms-classless-static-routes 19 , 172 , 27 , 0 , 10 , 20 , 30 , 40; ... } } into the global scope, Webmin handles the arguments correctly and performs no unintended quoting. However, since my dhcpd.conf covers multiple subnets, I cannot simply define the static route in the global...

Hello, as I said in my last post, if I move the following options shared-network NAME { ... subnet x.y.z.zz netmask 255.255.255.0 { ... option rfc3442-classless-static-routes 19 , 172 , 27 , 0 , 10 , 20 , 30 , 40; option ms-classless-static-routes 19 , 172 , 27 , 0 , 10 , 20 , 30 , 40; ... } } into the global scope, Webmin handles the arguments correctly and performs no unintended quoting. However, since my dhcpd.conf covers multiple subnets, I cannot simply define the static route in the global...

Just made some more tests and found something: In my example, the part with option rfc3442-classless-static-routes code 121 = array of integer 8; option ms-classless-static-routes code 249 = array of integer 8; ist located in global scope within dhcpd.conf, while the second part is nested inside subscopes as follows: shared-network NAME { ... subnet x.y.z.zz netmask 255.255.255.0 { ... option rfc3442-classless-static-routes 19 , 172 , 27 , 0 , 10 , 20 , 30 , 40; option ms-classless-static-routes...

Hi, thanks for the reply! I'm on exactly the same version: 1.953. (Ubuntu Linux 16.04.4, Linux 4.4.0-174-generic on x86_64) Did you check the newly written file "dhcpd.conf" after viewing the "Edit Client Options" and after pressing "Save"? (without changing any field) Whether before of after pressing "save" - the textfield in Webmin's GUI always shows the values without quotation. However, the argument in the output file will be quoted after the first press of "save".

The issue still happens with version 1.953 on Ubuntu 16.04.4 with ISC DHCPd version 4.3.3 I am wondering about the existence of this bug, since it should have been fixed already in [#4664] from 2015 and in [#4777] later in 2016. Steps to reproduce: I manually define the following options in dhcpd.conf by directly editing the file: option rfc3442-classless-static-routes code 121 = array of integer 8; option ms-classless-static-routes code 249 = array of integer 8; and later option rfc3442-classless-static-routes...

The issue still happens with version 1.953 on Ubuntu 16.04.4 with ISC DHCPd version 4.3.3 I am wondering about the existence of this bug, since it should have been fixed already in #4664 from 2015 and in #4777 later in 2016. Steps to reproduce: I manually define the following options in dhcpd.conf by directly editing the file: option rfc3442-classless-static-routes code 121 = array of integer 8; option ms-classless-static-routes code 249 = array of integer 8; and later option rfc3442-classless-static-routes...