Thank you, Roger. Now it is clear for me that my algorithm is wrong
Hi all, I keep encountering the same islanding problems, even though every line is connected. All circuits can be accessed from here For example, have a look at this circuit I don't understand what is wrong with this circuit, I double checked the connections Or the circuit below. Although this one can be solved, the plot in OpenDSS shows some disconnected lines where in fact they are connected. How this problem can be solved? Thank you
Hi all, I am trying to plot this small set of lines https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bbQj47mL0pO4tlozKTnm93hnGwthUTK7 I don't know why I get problems with islands, I checked the lines and everythings is connected. Could you run this program and give me some hints on what is going on. Thank you
Hello there!
Hello there! I'm new in OpenDSS and I'm doing LV study.
Hello,
Hello,
Hello, I applied Monte Carlo technique on a LV feeder. It randomly selects from 59 PV profiles for each penetration level. Usually, with increasing PV penetration, the percentage of consumers having voltage problems increases or stays at the same level. However, I get some decays between 50 and 60% and 80 and 90% penetration level. Below is the screenshot. Click to open screenshot What can be the reason? Is the algorithm incorrect
Hello, I applied Monte Carlo technique on a LV feeder. It randomly selects from 59 PV profiles for each penetration level. Usually, with increasing PV penetration, the percentage of consumers having voltage problems increases or stays at the same level. However, I get some decays between 50 and 60% and 80 and 90% penetration level. Below is the screenshot. Click to open screenshot What can be the reason? Is the algorithm incorrect? Thank you.
Hello, I applied Monte Carlo technique on a LV feeder. It randomly selects from 59 PV profiles for each penetration level. Usually, with increasing PV penetration, the percentage of consumers having voltage problems increases or stays at the same level. However, I get some decays between 50 and 60% and 80 and 90% penetration level. Below is the screenshot. Click to open screenshot What can be the reason? Is the algorithm incorrect? Thank you.
Hello, I applied Monte Carlo technique on a LV feeder. It randomly selects from 59 PV profiles for each penetration level. Usually, with increasing PV penetration, the percentage of consumers having voltage problems increases or stays at the same level. However, I get some decays between 50 and 60% and 80 and 90% penetration level. Below is the screenshot. What can be the reason? Is the algorithm incorrect? Thank you.
Hello, I applied Monte Carlo technique on a LV feeder. It randomly selects from 59 PV profiles for each penetration level. Usually, with increasing PV penetration, the percentage of consumers having voltage problems increases or stays at the same level. However, I get some decays between 50 and 60% and 80 and 90% penetration level. Below is the screenshot. What can be the reason? Is the algorithm incorrect? [url=https://imgbb.com/][img]https://image.ibb.co/h5s4D5/upstream.png[/img][/url] Thank y...
Hello, I applied Monte Carlo technique on a LV feeder. It randomly selects from 59 PV profiles for each penetration level. Usually, with increasing PV penetration, the percentage of consumers having voltage problems increases or stays at the same level. However, I get some decays between 50 and 60% and 80 and 90% penetration level. Below is the screenshot. What can be the reason? Is the algorithm incorrect? Thank you.
Once the spacing distances are available, how do I proceed?
Hello there! I'm new in OpenDSS and I'm doing LV study. Given cable thickness, is...
Hello there! I'm new in OpenDSS and I'm doing LV study. Given cable thickness, is...
Solved!
Hello, Roger. What software you're using to export XY coordinates from GIS? Thank...
Hello. I'm doing LV study and I'm new in OpenDSS. I received GIS from electricity...
Hello.
Hello. I'm doing study on LV network using interfacing with Matlab. I have 55 loads...