Activity for Hans Eisenstein
-
Hans Eisenstein posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion
Thanks a lot, Daniel! Works perfect for me, time to get some more complicated stuff running through the Gibbs reactor. Best regards, Hans
-
Great! Thanks a lot Daniel. Meanwhile, I will revise the carbon component data. Best, Hans
-
Dear Daniel, Many thanks for the many efforts you invested into enhancing the Gibbs reactor. I did the video tutorial simulation (from Sourceforge) with DWSIM 4.3 Update 13 and found that it works very well and produces similar results. Coming now to my solid-gaseous problem that to some point initiated your efforts: I changed the carbon combustion sample coming with DWSIM to run with the revised Gibbs reactor version instead of the conversion reactor. My problem is that even for this simple case,...
-
Dear Daniel, These are great news. Thanks a lot for your efforts and the reference to the thermodynamics book. I am looking forward to run the first solid-gas phase reactions in it. Keep the excellent work up! Best regards, Hans
-
Dear Daniel, These are great news. Thanks a lot for your efforts and the reference to the thermodynamics book. I am looking forward to run the first solid-gas phase reactions in it. Keep the excellent work up! Best regards, Thomas
-
Thanks for the prompt feedback, Daniel. Yes, these are pure component Gibbs energies...
-
Dear Daniel, Since I am very interested in having this feature in DWSIM, I did some...
-
Great, I knew it is just a matter of asking someone who is highly familiar with .NET....
-
For now, it is just the syslin solver. I guess that I will be able to abstract any...
-
Thanks for the suggestion, Daniel. I did some testing and was able to address the...
-
Btw., that is the error DWSIM throws out when having the aforementioned IronPython...
-
Daniel, You posted a link to the procedure to retrieve the latest available IronPython...
-
Hi Daniel, I would be grateful for a basic example on how to use the linear solvers...
-
No worries. It works like a charm now and I am not able to reproduce the material...
-
OK, fine. 'None' without the value does the job, 'none' not. Thanks for your tim...
-
To be precise: the values are set for the stream, but reset to the previous data...
-
The interesting point is that I can only set massflow (neither molarflow nor volumetric_flow)...
-
oxidantObj.GetPhase("Mixture").Properties.massflow.Value = None 602 04/11/2016 21:50:41...
-
Hi Daniel, Thanks for the prompt reply. 'none' is not working, since a float is expected...
-
Dear Daniel, I encounter problems when I try to change the molar or volumetric flow...
-
Great! Thanks a lot for the improvements. I am especially grateful that you considered...
-
Great, thanks a lot!
-
Dear Daniel, absolutely. Thanks in advance, Hans
-
Dear Daniel, I would be very grateful, if you could introduce a feature to define...
-
Dear Daniel, I would be very grateful, if you could introduce the feature to define...
-
Thanks Daniel. I meanwhile remembered your previous suggestion on adding a very low...
-
Thanks Daniel. I meanwhile remembered your previous suggestion on adding a very low...
-
-
Dear Daniel, I am using the latest build (5981) and set U=0 or Q=0 for a horizontal...
-
Great! Thanks a lot.
-
Dear Daniel, Thanks for updating DWSIM by the latest findings on the reactor units....
-
Works also fine for me. Right click on the PFR unit and check the 'Debug Object'...
-
Thanks a lot, Daniel! I am once again impressed by DWSIM's capabilties and your selfless...
-
Dear Daniel, First, thanks a lot for implementing the kinetic functions for the PFR...
-
Dear Daniel, First, thanks a lot for implementing the kinetic functions for the PFR...
-
OK, so the workaround is to use a cooler or heater to shift the stream to the desired...
-
Thanks for the prompt reply, Daniel. 3.7.5905 binaries from sf. Best, Hans
-
Dear Daniel and Colleagues, I encounter the following behaviour when using a pipe...
-
Thanks, Daniel. I will let you know, if any changes will be required from my side....
-
Thanks, Daniel. This looks very good. I still have to do some testing with this model...
-
Thanks, Daniel. This looks very good. Keep that fantastic work up and many thanks,...
-
Thanks, Daniel. This looks very good. Is it also possible to run heterogeneous reactions...
-
Thanks, Daniel! I am very grateful for your support. I will come back to you after...
-
Daniel, I just realized that there is a problem with the stream object. For instance,...
-
Brilliant, Daniel! I just compiled the latest version and will have a look at all...
-
Hi Daniel, I am also very interested in combustion of solid carbon, and thus would...
-
I had that idea before, too. But I get an expression error, when I type your examples...
-
Dear Daniel, I tested a few ideas, looked through all examples and the documentation,...
-
Many thanks for this workaround, Daniel! Adding, e.g., 0.0001 of N2 to the CO2 (to...
-
Many thanks for this workaround, Daniel! Adding, e.g., 0,0001 of N2 to the CO2 (to...
-
I agree that the pipe property profiles look reasonable, too. It is just the outlet...
-
Dear Daniel, Wow, that is a really fast reply. Yes (injecting it as a ChemSep component),...
-
Dear Daniel, Wow, that is a really fast reply. Yes (as a ChemSep component), but...
1