dr_pompeii

Thank You

Hello @pepdebian Can I copy/paste your answer (referring the link to here) in other forum? In fact in this network: https://itsfoss.community/t/have-you-tried-midori-web-browser/12546/ Pls let me know your thoughts Thank You

Hello Steve thanks for the extra information

Really huge thanks for the detailed feedback

Hello Friends For Peppermint 11.6 bullseye (32 bits) - at "Synaptic Package Manager" appears Midori as 7.0-2.1 But at https://astian.org/midori-browser/download/linux/ is possible download a .deb file based on the version 11.3.3 So my question is: What is the recommended approach to install Midori? Thus: Is safe install that 11.3.3 through the .deb file Should I wait an upgrade from the official repository? Thanks for your understanding

Hello Friends For Peppermint 11.6 bullseye (32 bits) - at "Synaptic Package Manager" appears Midori as 7.0-2.1 But at https://astian.org/midori-browser/download/linux/ is possible download a .deb file based on the version 11.3.3 So my question is: What is the recommended approach to install Midori? Thus: Is safe install that 11.3.3 through the .deb file Should I wait an upgrade from the official repository? Thanks for your understaning

Thanks for the reply In my case by default I got: cat /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" NAME="Debian GNU/Linux" VERSION_ID="11" VERSION="11 (bullseye)" VERSION_CODENAME=bullseye ID=debian HOME_URL="https://www.debian.org/" SUPPORT_URL="https://www.debian.org/support" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.debian.org/" Thus after to execute the suggested sudo xDaily command now I got cat /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="PeppermintOS" NAME="Peppermint" ID=peppermint HOME_URL="https://peppermintos.com"...

Hello In Fedora and Ubuntu when is executed the cat /etc/os-release command the output is according themselves respectively. But for Peppermint 11.6 bullseye appears the debian term instead. Why does not appear the Peppermint term? Thank You