User Activity

  • Posted a comment on discussion General Discussion on Equalizer APO

    Okay, I reupload and fix few things. Device: all Copy: VL=1.0*L Copy: VR=1.0*R Copy: VC=0.7071*L+0.7071*R Copy: VSL=0.866*L+-0.5*R Copy: VSR=-0.5*L+0.866*R Copy: VRL=VSL+-0.488*VSR Copy: VRR=-0.488*VSL+VSR Copy: L=VL Copy: R=VR Copy: C=VC Copy: RL=VRL Copy: RR=-1.0*VRR Copy: SL=VSL Copy: SR=-1.0*VSR Channel: C # Filter: ON HPQ Fc 70 Hz Q 0.7071 # Filter: ON HPQ Fc 70 Hz Q 0.7071 # Filter: ON LPQ Fc 20000 Hz Q 0.7071 # Filter: ON LPQ Fc 20000 Hz Q 0.7071 Channel: L R C Delay: 512 samples Channel:...

  • Posted a comment on discussion General Discussion on Equalizer APO

    Okay. I found wrong part was found in the last code. You can download the fixed code from the link. You just need to change the convolution path. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1m0gFQkdPJEIiJ0syRilghdVJ_2cX9vpl Copy: VSL=0.8165L+-0.5774R Copy: VSR=-0.5774L+0.8165R Copy: SL=VSL Copy: SR=VSR This is how the old code was written. However, L and R must be opposite polarities. Copy: VSL=0.8165L+-0.5774R Copy: VSR=-0.5774L+0.8165R Copy: SL=-1.0*VSL Copy: SR=VSR So, this is right. Also, I also made...

  • Posted a comment on discussion General Discussion on Equalizer APO

    I saw this link https://sourceforge.net/p/equalizerapo/discussion/general/thread/be4bf9de29/ However, we found that the phase shift did not work properly, and that the delay was not compensated for the other channels as correctly as the length of the convolution. So I was studying hillbert with GPT and I asked GPT to make a 90 degree phase shift of 48000 Samplates based on juha's script, and I reorganized the channel mixing. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1m0gFQkdPJEIiJ0syRilghdVJ_2cX9vpl?usp=drive_link...

  • Posted a comment on discussion General Discussion on Peace Equalizer, interface Equalizer APO

    Sorry I've seen and checked your beta before. It worked fine. Export And I was going to leave a comment saying it works well but I forgot.

  • Posted a comment on discussion General Discussion on Equalizer APO

    I don't know if the developer will respond to this, but I've seen the writing on the APO forum and Github. It feels different from the 90 degree phase shift I thought, and the frequency response actually changes a lot. (Sort of bass boost, reduced pitch) Did you mean it? And there is a delay of 100ms in the Wav file itself. For example, the LI/RI virtual channel of the Dolby Prologic document has a delay of 13ms So the delay of 13ms + 100ms is all intended as well?

  • Posted a comment on discussion General Discussion on Peace Equalizer, interface Equalizer APO

    I like beta. Of course, maybe i can wait

  • Posted a comment on discussion General Discussion on Peace Equalizer, interface Equalizer APO

    Not in the current version but for the upcoming version I've added an input field in which a resolution can be given which determines the number of exported frequencies. This means that the user can influence the resolution of the imported EQ in Audacity. A lower frequency resolution value means more frequencies thus a more accurate EQ which better mimic the EQ in Peace. Besides, these frequencies will be far better spread over the frequency spectrum causing on itself a better EQ at lower frequencies...

  • Posted a comment on discussion General Discussion on Peace Equalizer, interface Equalizer APO

    Also, I found the bug you have encountered. I'll correct it. You means, Errror as i attached latest version? In other words, more frequencies need to be added in the export feature in the lower part of the frequency spectrum. Above 500 Hz the resolution is just fine. Is that also something that can be fixed in peace? I think it would be great if it works. Of course, I don't use the export of peace, and I can use it by mixing it in Audacity after I apply the EQ in REW myself, but since the process...

View All

Personal Data

Username:
dididingdong
Joined:
2023-01-19 14:42:23.114000

Projects

  • No projects to display.

Personal Tools