david M brooke

Hi ET, Now I would argue that we should leave the name convention for the bridge package as is, e.g. bridge.lrp I agree that would be the 'cleanest' option - provided we can maintain the same behaviour for bridges defined in /etc/network/interfaces (especially since the package name is 'bridge.lrp' and so matches the new command name). Looking at my currently running box (7.1.0) ip appears not to have this capability gatekeeper# bridge --help -sh: bridge: not found That is to be expected; we currently...

Hi ET, Thanks for your input. I have not looked in the new interfaces but would ifup/ifdown work the same? I believe so - in fact I think we need to require that. We would want to make sure that the existing syntax in /etc/network/interfaces works as today. As long as we can arrange that, the only users impacted would be those which call 'brctl' from their own scripts. dMb

bridge-utils (for 'brctl') is deprecated upstream

initrd: reduce risk of squashfs unmount while still loading modules

Add experimental guestfish.pl

Conditional processing for kdebuginfo files

-> in templates/files-*.cfg

Fix for expand of