XXX

Thanks a lot for your response Peter. Yep, definitely a bunch of things needed to be realised before it began to make some sense, with the default bumps to bass and such which the website introduces. I did dial the bass back once I noticed the Advanced menu (after my initial post) and also discovered that's where I could select "Flat" (I want a flat response because I produce music and so I'd like to hear commercial music in a flat manner too). Maybe I didn't read it right, but the values still didn't...

Thanks a lot for your response Peter. Yep, definitely a bunch of things needed to be realised before it began to make some sense, with the default bumps to bass and such which the website introduces. I did dial the bass back once I noticed the Advanced menu (after my initial post) and also discovered that's where I could select "Flat" (I want a flat response because I produce music and so I'd like to hear commercial music in a flat manner too). Maybe I didn't read it right, but the values still didn't...

Thanks a lot for your response Peter. Yep, definitely a bunch of things needed to be realised before it began to make some sense, with the default bumps to bass and such which the website introduces. I did dial the bass back once I noticed the Advanced menu (after my initial post) and also discovered that's where I could select "Flat" (I want a flat response because I produce music and so I'd like to hear commercial music in a flat manner too). Maybe I didn't read it right, but the values still didn't...

I was operating under some misunderstandings, and probably still am (e.g. I wasn't targetting a flat response and used 48000 Hz, but that shouldn't have made too much difference in comparing the resulting Peace graphs I believe). But after some more reading, this is what I've concluded: Both AutoEQ website and Peace use AutoEQ's GitHub as their base source. Peace's serves the user the GitHub data directly. Either uses no target, or use the Harman target (or some variant of it) baked into the data....

I was operating under some misunderstandings, and probably still am (e.g. I wasn't targetting a Flat response and 48000 Hz, but that shouldn't have made too much difference in comparing the resulting Peace graphs I believe). But after some more reading, this is what I've concluded: Both AutoEQ website and Peace use AutoEQ's GitHub as their base source. Peace's serves the user the GitHub data directly. Either uses no target, or use the Harman target (or some variant of it) baked into the data. It's...

I was operating under some misunderstandings, and probably still am (e.g. I wasn't targetting a Flat response, but that shouldn't have made much difference in comparing the resulting Peace graphs I believe). But after some more reading, this is what I've concluded: Both AutoEQ website and Peace use AutoEQ's GitHub as their base source. Peace's serves the user the GitHub data directly. Either uses no target, or use the Harman target (or some variant of it) baked into the data. It's unclear to me....

I was operating under some misunderstandings, and probably still am. But after some more reading, this is what I've concluded: Both AutoEQ website and Peace use AutoEQ's GitHub as their base source. Peace's serves the user the GitHub data directly. Either uses no target, or use the Harman target (or some variant of it) baked into the data. It's unclear to me. No way to change your target to flat via Peace I think. The AutoEQ website however lets you define your preferred target but a choice is automatically...

I was operating under some misunderstandings, and probably still am. But after some more reading, this is what I've concluded: Both AutoEQ website and Peace use AutoEQ's GitHub as their base source. Peace's serves the user the GitHub data directly. Either uses no target, or use the Harman target (or some variant of it) baked into the data. It's unclear to me. No way to change your target to flat via Peace I think. The AutoEQ website however lets you define your preferred target but a choice is automatically...