Vaibhav - Here's RPM/Yum info from fedora 32 - so you can compare. Hope this helps. I have not had SuSE since I stopped paying for it 15-20 years ago! rpm -q -i samba-winexe Name : samba-winexe Epoch : 2 Version : 4.12.10 Release : 0.fc32 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Sun 29 Nov 2020 09:54:02 AM EST Group : Unspecified Size : 105914 License : GPLv3 Signature : RSA/SHA256, Thu 05 Nov 2020 07:43:28 AM EST, Key ID 6c13026d12c944d0 Source RPM : samba-4.12.10-0.fc32.src.rpm Build Date : Thu 05 Nov...
WOW! Now that's what I call progress. Back in 2015, it was looking bleak. If it's actually in RPM via Yum repos now, I'm impressed. I'll have to test this out now. (yep, just installed it, I'm very impressed) Thanks for the pointer!
Funny, me resurrecting a thread I created 5 years ago :-) I'm back on this - situation is different, but I again need winexe. I have fedora 32 on backuppc server. My command line is also: ( ./waf --samba-dir=../samba configure build ) 2>&1 | tee ../waf-with-python2.7.log (This machine has python 3 as default. I got other errors trying to run 'waf' so flipped the symlink to python 2.7, and got the errors in the attached file below ("err: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsmb_static"). There are instructions...
winexe failure with any samba newer than v4.1
FYI, looks like only the 'beta4' 5.1 is broken this way. Also FYI, I had to remove...
If someone could provide an example of the expected sar text file format I might...
kSar can't read sarNN files on Fedora 20 or RHEL 6.5