Activity for Steve Beaumont

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Jamulus Software

    Sorry to jump in here, but, the idea caught my attention. So, you are setting 'jack' to the required jack buffer size of 64, I don't understand where are you setting the multiplier? ../Steve

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Jamulus Software

    I think -F is referring to the startup option for jamulus process not for "systemctl <whatever> -f " = force, meaning shutdown immediately amongst other things. You'll need to edit the you jamulus service startup file and add -F to the correct line. The line will be similar to the following with the -F option added. ../Steve</whatever> ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/Jamulus -s -n -F -e jamulus.fischvolk.de -o "yourServerName;yourCity;[country ID]"

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Jamulus Server

    Hi, I live in Hampshire , near Basingstoke and the AWS server is in London, ping times to the AWS server are around 8 to 10 ms, which is pretty good but it can be a little erratic at times. I'm currently trying a n IONOS (1&1) virtual server as the it provides 2 vCores with 2Gb RAM and 80Gb's of memory for an INITIAL price of £2/month. Ping times are around the 10 to 12 ms slightly slower, but initially seems more stable. ../Steve

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Jamulus Server

    Hi, if this is covered elsewhere please delete. After reading many positive reviews of the AWS Lightsail VPS and Jamulus I decided to have a look a the basic product which comes in at an incredibly cheap $3.50 ( £2.50 UKP or there abouts). I've paid more for lousy coffee :-) All went well following various useful guides on this forum, the problem came at Jamulus compile time. The compile process was failing random points. Reading various articles on the web it transpired that this can be caused by...

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Jamulus Software

    Chris, just had another thought. If your OK with a single session. You could use Jack audio + Carla and map each required input to Jamulus as required. This works well and results in a single stream (and therefore session) However, Jack can be fiddly to get running on Windows, it takes a bit of effort. Better in Linux, I use Ubuntu studio or you might want to try JamulusOS ../Steve

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Jamulus Software

    Chris, yes correct each instance will require its own stream to and from the server and therefore bandwidth can become an issue. That being said I haven't had much trouble with bandwidth. Running in stereo and High quality seem to be 729kb/s which means 729k in both directions. The limit in my case is the 'upload' speed, my absolute maximum is 20Mb/s which cope with two or three sessions OK.

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Jamulus Software

    I do something similar to this with the Soundcraft Ui24r surface-less mixer. I have found I can run multiple instances of Jamulus and map each instance to a different set IO port of theUi24r. This gives me the ability to have several sessions running at the same time and have level control over each input. I've know escaped Windows for this and use the Ui24r + Ubuntu Studio (which includes Jack& Carla) this gives me a lot of flexibility including the ability to connect any input or output of the...

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Hi, Not sure this is the right place for a feature request, please bump or move if not applicable here. For various reasons I run multiple instances (3 to 4) of the Jamulus client on a single Windows based PC. I have noticed that the Jamulus loads a default profile on start up which seems to be the setting used during the last session. Running multiple instances means that each time I start an instance I have re-select the required setting for each instance, such as the input and output channel mappings,...

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Rehearsal room - Creating music with Jamulus

    Hi Gilgongo - Apologies for not replying earlier. Yes, we initially had inputs for lead vocals, piano and backing going into a mixer the output of which went to one Jamulus Client. This worked as you would expect. The 'problem' we were experiencing was that the mix was identical for vocals, piano and backing. So, if the lead vocal was struggling to here because of the backing we had to turn the backing down for all and similar with all users. Using multiple clients gave everyone control over their...

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Rehearsal room - Creating music with Jamulus

    Experience using Jamulus If this post is not relevant please delete. Having extensively used Jamulus for several rehearsals now I thought it might be a good idea to share how out band is getting along with it. We are a three-piece band consisting of Lead Vocals, Bass guitar and keyboards (myself) we make use of backing tracks for drums and some strings, etc. all of which have been produced and recorded by the band. We target playing live however, during the restrictions imposed by Corona virus and...

  • Steve Beaumont Steve Beaumont posted a comment on discussion Rehearsal room - Creating music with Jamulus

    This is an amazing piece of software and so versatile, which I think is down to its simplisity. I have beed surprosed out how low the latency can be. We 'Time At The Bar' have largely been using Jamulus as our band has been unable to rehease since the corona virus and associated lock downs. Jamulus has proved to be a life line. I find much more 40ms difficult to handle and direct monitorring is practicall impossible as far as I can hear.

1
MongoDB Logo MongoDB