Anthony Holland

Ok, thanks for that pointer! On Jun 23, 2020, at 3:17 PM, Gilgongo gilgongojones@users.sourceforge.net<mailto:gilgongojones@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: Hi Anthony - try posting a feature request here and the devs should be able to consider it: https://github.com/corrados/jamulus/issues Jamulus Sample Rate Suggestionhttps://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/software/thread/d746a1ea4a/?limit=100#5e06/8ea0 Sent from sourceforge.nethttp://sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/software/...

Thanks for that information and that pointer! Much appreciated! Anthony On Jun 23, 2020, at 3:40 AM, DonC doncor@users.sourceforge.net<mailto:doncor@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: Hi Anthony, Jamulus never sends the straight sampled data. We have 3 "Audio Quality" levels which correspond to different bit rates produced by the OPUS audio codec. You can look here to find out more: https://github.com/corrados/jamulus/wiki/Quality,-delay-and-network-bandwidth As it is now I find that there is a great...

Hello Jamulus Gurus, I have a suggestion for Jamulus…. It seems to me that you might want to have an option for the user to Lower the sample rate for Jamulus. Right now, I think it works at 48kHz, but I think if you ran a 22.05kHz sample rate that would reduce the data load greatly and still be acceptable in sound quality. That would give you a Nyquist (max) frequency of 11kHz, which for folks needing real time online jamming/rehearsing would be good enough. I’ve done lots of hearing tests with my...