Activity for Aerodrummer
-
Aerodrummer modified a comment on discussion Hardware Related
It’s the same driver I’m using with my Behringer UMC1820. I confirm, fast and stable. It works also with the UMC204HD and UMC404HD (they have MIDI IN/OUT)
-
Maybe I haven’t really understood what you are trying to do, Jamulus has just 2 mono or 1 stereo inputs. But I’m asking myself if you want to use your MIDI keyboard as a sound-device or a MIDI controller. If it’s the latter you don’t need to set it up as an ASIO device, you should be able to use your keyboard as a MIDI device and use your DAW as a virtual mixing console. Choose Jackrouter as ASIO device in your DAW, setup your keyboard as a MIDI device and after you can use your softs as VSTIs, do...
-
It’s better now, I can see your Behringer. And like David said, don’t activate the DIRECT MONITOR button. PS You will not have a good experience with a buffer size of 512 samples! Set it to 128 and increase only if you get crackles.
-
It’s better now, I can see your Behringer. And like David said, don’t activate the DIRECT MONITOR button.
-
I don’t see any sign in your attached files (Information on Jamulus installatio.pdf and Sound configuration Laptop.pdf) that your U-Phoria UM2 is recognized by your computer. The only devices I can see are your internal Realtek card and Intel (surly for HDMI sound).
-
It’s the same driver I’m using with my Behringer UMC1820. I confirm, fast and stable.
-
Maybe I haven’t really understood what you are trying to do, Jamulus has just 2 mono or 1 stereo inputs. But I’m asking myself if you want to use your MIDI keyboard as a sound-device or a MIDI controller. If it’s the latter you don’t need to set it up as an ASIO device, you should be able to use your keyboard as a MIDI device and use your DAW as a virtual mixing console. Choose Jackrouter as ASIO device in your DAW, setup your keyboard as a MIDI device and after you can use your softs as VSTIs, do...
-
Not the same card, neither a solution, but I found this and it remembers me your case. https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/533517/thread/a10703c6a0/#d0ba https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/software/thread/d27da5225a/#2db2
-
Not the same card, neither a solution, but I found this and it remembers me your case. https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/533517/thread/a10703c6a0/#d0ba
-
If your interface works under Windows isn’t a prove that it works in ASIO. Most multimedia programs don’t support ASIO and normally Windows will use it’s WDM / WASAPI drivers. And those aren’t supported by Jamulus. And here comes Asio4All into the game. Asio4All is just a wrapper around the wdm driver which would tell to Jamulus “I AM A ASIO CARD”, but by adding an extra layer of processing. Never buy a sound-card which doesn’t come with it’s own ASIO driver!
-
Like DonC said, I have never seen that with any sound-card. I don’t know la Focusrite, but with my UMC1820 I have a little taskbar tool where I can set buffers, sample-rate, etc and there is also a little mixer for adjusting levels of in- and outputs. Do you have anything like that with your Focusrite? I’m also surprised that the Focusrite driver doesn’t let you set inputs and outputs in Jamulus. And even weirder: it turns out that if I plug my Focusrite into a different laptop - it works just fine...
-
OK you are right, if you can configure the routing this might work, and I didn’t say Windows cannot. But in general my purely subjective opinion is to avoid hard-wiring of inputs and outputs.
-
https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/hardware/thread/f6d4fae2a2/#4c5c
-
I would be surprised if this could work, I don’t think Windows allows you to use 2 sound-cards in the same time. At least without using Voicemeeter (and Jack), and then you wouldn’t need the cable! I have tested the three solutions (I know) Voicemeeter, Jack Audio and Reaper. Voicemeeter is nice, but the sound gets bad after some time (on my computer), so I cannot recommend. Jack and Reaper are working very well in this situation, but Reaper is more easy to use.
-
Just to make sure, do you have selected your ASIO card in Device, set your Input Channel Mapping to Input1 = L, Input2 = R and set the Audio Channels to Mono-in/Stereo-out? What ASIO driver are you using (those from Focusrite or Asio4all)? You have tested both inputs are working (as an ASIO device!) without Jamulus (in a DAW)? You have tested by connecting to your local server if this problem is present?
-
Just to make sure, do you have selected your ASIO card in Device, set your Input Channel Mapping to Input1 = L, Input2 = R and set the Audio Channels to Mono-in/Stereo-out? What ASIO driver are you using (those from Focusrite or Asio4all)? You have tested both inputs are working (as an ASIO device!) without Jamulus (in a DAW)?
-
Client ports and server ports aren’t the same. When you start your server in GUI mode without fixing a port and you connect a client to your local loop-back address (127.0.0.1) you will see in your server it’s client port will be 22175 for the first, 22176 for the second, 22177 for the third … How did you setup your Windows firewall? This is what had worked for me:
-
When you say you can connect locally, is it from the same computer, or from another computer in your local network? If it’s not the latter, could you try to connect from another computer in your home-network to the local address (this one which starts with 192.168.x.x) of your server and the port you have chosen? And I didn’t understand, if you are registering your server as a public server, can anyone connect to it, and do you see each other / play together? If this works you can try what DonC said,...
-
Client ports and server ports aren’t the same. When you start your server in GUI mode without fixing a port and you connect a client to your local loop-back address (127.0.0.1) you will see in your server it’s client port will be 22175 for the first, 22176 for the second, 22177 for the third … How did you setup your Windows firewall? This is what I have:
-
Client ports and server ports aren’t the same. When you start your server in GUI mode without fixing a port and you connect a client to your local loop-back address (127.0.0.1) you will see in your server it’s client port will be 22175 for the first, 22176 for the second, 22177 for the third … How did you setup your Windows firewall?
-
Client ports and server ports aren’t the same. When you start your server in GUI mode without fixing a port and you connect a client to your local loop-back address (127.0.0.1) you will see in your server it’s client port will be 22175 for the first, 22176 for the second, 22177 for the third …
-
You need to remove -e (--centralserver) and -o (--serverinfo) options in your start script. https://jamulus.io/wiki/Command-Line-Options
-
You need to remove -e (--centralserver) and -o (--serverinfo) options in your start script.
-
We need to verify things one by one. I don’t know if it’s necessary, but I’m starting Reaper in first for making sure ReaRoute is initialized. Start by closing everything. After start just Reaper I suppose you have deleted track 3 like I’ve done. Do you have verified the routings in reaper? Track 1 goes to Master send Track 2 goes to ReaRoute 1 / 2 with master send deactivated Track 3 goes to ReaRoute 3 / 4 with master send deactivated Input track 1 - ReaRoute 9 /10 Input track 2 - Your microphone...
-
In my example I’ve deleted track 3, so track 4 becomes track 3! Can you verify you have this in your routings ?
-
In my example I’ve deleted track 3, so track 4 becomes track 3! Can you verify you have this in your routing tables?
-
In my example I’ve deleted track 3, so track 4 becomes track 3! Can you verify you have this in your routing tables?
-
Don’t give up, there is nearly always a solution. First, are you sure having installed ReaRoute? It’s not something which installs automatically with Reaper, you have to activate an option whilst installing. Have you done this? Q1: Yes Q2: 2 or 3 Q3: Track 4 is used to play a media file → Reaper menu → Insert → Media file Q4: Not really, but you need at least to “arm” (click on the red button over FX) your microphone input. Do you see a signal (VU meter) when you speak in your microphone?
-
With the Jack Audio Connection Kit (https://jackaudio.org/news/) you can have 4 inputs and 4 outputs in Jamulus. But you would still have to use 2 clients with a different --clientname and –inifile for doing what you want. And there is a new release which should resolve the problems a lot of users have encountered with the last one. It is freeware and open source and I have used Jack with Jamulus for months, but now I really prefer using Reaper for this.
-
With the Jack Audio Connection Kit (https://jackaudio.org/news/) you can have 4 inputs and 4 outputs in Jamulus. You would still have to use 2 clients with a different --clientname and –inifile for doing what you want. And there is a new release which should resolve the problems a lot of users have encountered with the last one. It is freeware and open source and I have used Jack with Jamulus for months, but now I really prefer using Reaper for this.
-
If you are speaking about this driver “BEHRINGER_2902_X64_2.8.40” you can choose the buffer size in “System performance” (it’s not called buffer size, but it does what you want to do). And don’t forget to restart Jamulus after having changed something.
-
Jamulus only has 2 inputs and 2 outputs. By using Reaper you could try what I’ve done here: https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/software/thread/01153f6291/#72cb There is a simple Reaper project attached for 2 Jamulus clients. Setup your Presonus 1810c in Reaper and activate inputs and outputs 1 to 4. After you have to adapt my setup by using Jamulus Client 1 (Track-input 2, you can mute or delete track 3) for the first and Jamulus Client 2 (Track-input 4) for the second singer. Setup your...
-
It might sound complicated, but when you know where to put what you can do this in 5 minutes. I have made you a very simple Reaper project for 2 Jamulus clients. (“Jamulus 2 clients.rpp”) After having load it in Reaper you need to setup your ASIO device in Preferences (Ctrl+P). Next you need to setup your inputs in Track 2 & 3. In Track 4 you will place your mp3s. In Track 1 is what is coming back from the server. Setting up the clients: Replace YOUR-USER-NAME with your real username Go to the folder...
-
It might sound complicated, but when you know where to put what you can do this in 5 minutes. I have made you a very simple Reaper project for 2 Jamulus clients. (“Jamulus 2 clients.rpp”) After having load it in Reaper you need to setup your ASIO device in Preferences (Ctrl+P). Next you need to setup your inputs in Track 2 & 3. In Track 4 you will place your mp3s. In Track 1 is what is coming back from the server. Setting up the clients: Replace YOUR-USER-NAME with your real username Go to the folder...
-
With Reaper you could try what I’ve done here: https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/software/thread/01153f6291/#a012 Setup your Presonus 1810c in Reaper and activate inputs 1 to 4 and outputs 1 & 2. After you have to adapt my setup by using Jamulus LIVE (Track-input 1&2) for the first and Jamulus PLAYBACK ( Track-input 3&4) for the second singer. Reaper isn’t free even if you can use it without paying. You could also try using Jack (open-source), but it’s more complicate to setup than Reap...
-
I’m still believing that it is a sort of digital feedback. Something like this happened to me when I was playing with Voicemeeter’s asio drivers and I made a mistake with routings. Which input- and which output device did you select in Jamulus settings? And the same for Reaper.
-
You can mix your drum-vst, your microphone, backing tracks, etc. with Reaper and route them with ReaRoute from Reaper into Jamulus in stereo without the need of an external mixing console. If it will help you in your situation I cannot say, but if you haven't found already a solution to this problem, you should at least try what DonC has asked you to do and report back if you still have this noise. BTW, which input- and which output device did you select in Jamulus settings?
-
I don’t know if I’m doing right, but I have made it like this. First I’m using 2 clients, one for my Aerodrums and the other for everything else like microphone, loops, click-track, backing-track, etc.. I’m starting my two clients like this: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Jamulus\jamulus.exe" --clientname PLAYBACK --inifile C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Jamulus\JamulusPlayback.ini and "C:\Program Files (x86)\Jamulus\jamulus.exe" --clientname LIVE --inifile C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Jamulus\JamulusLive.ini...
-
I wouldn't hardwire outputs to inputs. But if you are already running Jamulus and Reaper together, why don't you use ReaRoute? You can do your mixing in Reaper.
-
Are you using ReaRoute? If so, are you sure not having made a feedback in your routings between Reaper and Jamulus? You can see here how I'm doing. https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/software/thread/01153f6291/#a012
-
I don’t know if I’m doing right, but I have made it like this. First I’m using 2 clients, one for my Aerodrums and the other for everything else like microphone, loops, click-track, backing-track, etc.. I’m starting my two clients like this: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Jamulus\jamulus.exe" --clientname PLAYBACK --inifile C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Jamulus\JamulusPlayback.ini and "C:\Program Files (x86)\Jamulus\jamulus.exe" --clientname LIVE --inifile C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Jamulus\JamulusLive.ini...
-
I don’t know if I’m doing right, but I have made it like this. First I’m using 2 clients, one for my Aerodrums and the other for everything else like microphone, loops, click-track, backing-track, etc.. I’m starting my two clients like this: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Jamulus\jamulus.exe" --clientname PLAYBACK --inifile C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Jamulus\JamulusPlayback.ini and "C:\Program Files (x86)\Jamulus\jamulus.exe" --clientname LIVE --inifile C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Jamulus\JamulusLive.ini...
-
Hi Don, OK, I’ve understood what you mean, and I share your opinion that a better interface will get you better delay times. I’ve bought myself an U-Phoria UMC1820 some month ago, which is now my primary sound-card, and it makes a big difference. And it’s really not easy to use Jamulus without a microphone, especially when you are starting with Jamulus, but it’s possible to mix a microphone to your instrument by using Jack and Voicemeeter. But I only wanted to say, if you have one of these cards,...
-
Hi Don, OK, I’ve understood what you mean, and I share your opinion that a better interface will get you better delay times. I’ve bought myself an U-Phoria UMC1820 some month ago, which is now my primary sound-card, and it makes a big difference. And it’s really not easy to use Jamulus without a microphone, especially when you are starting with Jamulus, but it’s possible to mix a microphone to your instrument by using Jack and Voicemeeter. But I only wanted to say, if you have one of these cards,...
-
Hi Don, OK, I’ve understood what you mean, and I share your opinion that a better interface will get you better delay times. I’ve bought myself an U-Phoria UMC1820 some month ago, which is now my primary sound-card, and it makes a big difference. And it’s really not easy to use Jamulus without a microphone, especially when you are starting with Jamulus, but it’s possible to mix a microphone to your instrument by using Jack and Voicemeeter. But I only wanted to say, if you have one of these cards,...
-
I don’t really understand what ping times have to do with a sound-card. Like I said, I don’t know the UM2, my original post was about the devices I have, and I’m using with the original Behringer driver under Windows 10. This are: Behringer U-CONTROL UCA202 Behringer U-Phono UFO 202 Behringer XENYX QX 1202 USB MIXER Behringer U-CONTROL UMA25S USB keyboard and MIDI controller And with all I get an overall-delay of 19-23 ms. (to my own server) And I forgot the Behringer Guitar Link UCG102 a friend...
-
I don’t really understand what ping times have to do with a sound-card. Like I said, I don’t know the UM2, my original post was about the devices I have, and I’m using with the original Behringer driver under Windows 10. This are: Behringer U-CONTROL UCA202 Behringer U-Phono UFO 202 Behringer XENYX QX 1202 USB MIXER Behringer U-CONTROL UMA25S USB keyboard and MIDI controller And with all I get an overall-delay of 19-23 ms. (to my own server) And I forgot the Behringer Guitar Link UCG102 a friend...
-
I don’t really understand what ping times have to do with a sound-card. Like I said, I don’t know the UM2, my original post was about the devices I have, and I’m using with the original Behringer driver under Windows 10. This are: Behringer U-CONTROL UCA202 Behringer U-Phono UFO 202 Behringer XENYX QX 1202 USB MIXER Behringer U-CONTROL UMA25S USB keyboard and MIDI controller And with all I get an overall-delay of 19-23 ms. (to my own server) And I forgot the Behringer Guitar Link UCG102 a friend...
-
I don’t really understand what ping times have to do with a sound-card. Like I said, I don’t know the UM2, my original post was about the devices I have, and I’m using with the original Behringer driver under Windows 10. This are: Behringer U-CONTROL UCA202 Behringer U-Phono UFO 202 Behringer XENYX QX 1202 USB MIXER Behringer U-CONTROL UMA25S USB keyboard and MIDI controller And with all I get an overall-delay of 19-23 ms. (to my own server) And I forgot the Behringer Guitar Link UCG10 a friend of...
-
I don’t really understand what ping times have to do with a sound-card. Like I said, I don’t know the UM2, my original post was about the devices I have, and I’m using with the original Behringer driver under Windows 10. This are: Behringer U-CONTROL UCA202 Behringer U-Phono UFO 202 Behringer XENYX QX 1202 USB MIXER Behringer U-CONTROL UMA25S USB keyboard and MIDI controller And with all I get an overall-delay of 19-21 ms. (to my own server)
-
Here at https://github.com/corrados/jamulus/wiki/Hardware-Setup you can read something about the Behringer U-CONTROL UCA202 sound card and it’s native ASIO driver (BEHRINGER_2902_X64_2.8.40.zip / 855kB). I just want to report that I am using this driver since 5 years successfully, it was the official driver in this time, and not only with this card, but also with the following equipment: Behringer U-Phono UFO 202 Behringer XENYX QX 1202 USB MIXER Behringer U-CONTROL UMA25S USB keyboard and MIDI controller...
-
VOTE: llcon Without any doubt, even for the Project of the Year 2020!
-
For me the last one working was 3.4.4 on Windows 10.
-
Yes for all three questions. Just look 4 days ago in this discussion.
-
It was a little bit more complicated for me than just to extract jamulus_1.exe, but I’ve gotten the picture. All is running now like I want it to, c’est génial, vielen Dank.
-
Thank you for all, you are very, very reactive.
-
PS. I’ve just seen NecroDM’s post in Fabricer’s tread. May I ask how you are doing this?
-
So I made some tests with the programs of the Native Complete Starter Pack like Guitar Rig 5, Komplete Kontrol, Reaktor 6, all 64 bits programs and Reaper 32 and Reaper 64. All let me choose JackRouter as device and I can do routings in the connection window. And I tried with 44,1 and 48 Khz. The only one which crashes is Jamulus. I think in this case there is not too much to expect from the Jack devs side. Another thing. When I look in Files I see that the Linux branch is still stuck at 3.4.4. Is...
-
I’ve forgotten to say, the first time I was trying to do the same like Fabricer by going back to 3.4.4, because I needed to test if I could get Aerodrums @ 48KHz into Jamulus. And this worked, I even gained 2 ms Overall Delay compared to my normal use with 2 computers. But after I wasn’t able to install and run any other version over 3.4.4. More strange, after having tried to install and run all versions up to 3.4.7, I even couldn't go back to 3.4.4. And I had always deinstalled one version before...
-
I’ve tried two times, the second time by using a restore point taken before the first time. The first time I did like here https://jackaudio.org/faq/jack_on_windows.html by doing regsvr32 "C:\Program Files (x86)\Jack v1.9.8\64bits\JackRouter.dll" like they say, what didn’t work (because the folder Jack v1.9.8 doesn’t exist, it’s Jack). Going to C:\Program Files (x86)\Jack\64bits\ and doing regsvr32 JackRouter.dll worked. After I configured Portaudio’s command-line like they are telling on this page....
-
I’ve forgotten to say, the first time I was trying to do the same like Fabricer by going back to 3.4.4, because I needed to test if I could get Aerodrums @ 48KHz into Jamulus. And this worked, I even gained 2 ms Overall Delay compared to my normal use with 2 computers. But after I wasn’t able to install and run any other version over 3.4.4. More strange, after having tried to install and run all versions up to 3.4.7, I even couldn't go back to 3.4.4. And I had always deinstalled one version before...
-
No, no one succeeded, but other routings with Jack Control seems to work. Will do some testing later in the evening.
-
I’ve tried two times, the second time by using a restore point taken before the first time. The first time I did like here https://jackaudio.org/faq/jack_on_windows.html by doing regsvr32 "C:\Program Files (x86)\Jack v1.9.8\64bits\JackRouter.dll" like they say, what didn’t work (because the folder Jack v1.9.8 doesn’t exist, it’s Jack). Going to C:\Program Files (x86)\Jack\64bits\ and doing regsvr32 JackRouter.dll worked. After I configured Portaudio’s command-line like they are telling on this page....
-
I am sorry, but I have the same problem as Fabricer here ( https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/software/thread/b9c94789d5/ ) and any help would be greatly appreciated. As soon I chose JackRouter as the soundcard device, Jamulus crashes. Installed Jack version is “Jack_v1.9.11_64_setup.exe”. My soundcard is an U-phoria UMC1820 from Behringer with it’s official (and unique) driver installed (BEHRINGER_UMC_v4.59.0_2019-03-14) and my computer, an i7 with 16GB RAM running Windows 10 Pro 64bits....
-
Found this on YouTube: JAMULUS THE MOVIE 28th March 2020 https://youtu.be/2x-gwMmVK-s
-
Yes, your external address (and port if you've changed it)
-
Don't register your server to the central server. And have you tried to put 22122-22125 in Public Port Range AND Target Port Range of your router?
-
Don't register your server to the central server. And have you tried to put 22122-22125 in Public Port Range AND Target Port Range.
-
Don't register your server to the central server.
-
Don't register to the central server.
-
The Windows client is on the same computer as your server, so it’s normal you see the loopback address. Is the mac client in the same network as your Windows computer? If it’s so, you could try to put your internal IP address (and server port?) of your Windows computer in your mac client. But someone outside needs to know your external IP and port if you have it modified. No need for dyndns if you (and the people outside) are knowing your external IP (and port). But you need to open the ports on...
-
The Windows client is on the same computer as our server, so it’s normal you see the loopback address. Is the mac client in the same network as your Windows computer? If it’s so, you could try to put your internal IP address (and server port?) of your Windows computer in your mac client. But someone outside needs to know your external IP and port if you have it modified. No need for dyndns if you (and the people outside) are knowing your external IP (and port). But you need to open the ports on your...
-
Looking at your picture (portfor.jpg) I think you should put 22122-22125 in Public Port Range AND Target Port Range.
1