Aria Bamdad

Actually, the other bug was relating to iptables and it is correctly reported for 1.973 so just this one is incorrect and can be close. Thank you again.

Jamie. I have to apologize. I opened a few bug reports together and wrongly assumed both systems I was working on were running the latest 1.973 release. This and another but I reported (which I will try to close) were running on a 1.850 release. I upgraded to 1.973 and both problems are fixed. I am sorry to have wasted your time.

Configuration page for partition management command is set to Choose automatically. Parted command on /dev/sda: # parted /dev/sda unit cyl print Model: ATA ST1000NM0033-9ZM (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 121601cyl Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 121601,255,63. Each cylinder is 8225kB. Partition Table: msdos Disk Flags: Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 0cyl 2088cyl 2088cyl primary linux-swap(v1) raid, type=fd 2 2088cyl 15142cyl 13054cyl primary ext4...

Hi Jamie, The Partitions on Local Disks page only shows the SATA devices and nothing else. The NVMe devices/partitions are not listed. The output of the parted command is: Model: NVMe Device (nvme) Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 62260cyl Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 62260,255,63. Each cylinder is 8225kB. Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 0cyl 62260cyl 62260cyl raid Thank you.

The base device is nvme0n1 for the first drive and nvme1n1 for the second. Each is a Samsung 970 PRO SSD 512GB. They are both installed in an Asus Hyper M.2 expansion card supporting 4 NVMe drives. Thanks.

Hi Jamie, Yes, the sure do: testsys: # cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 259 0 500107608 nvme1n1 259 2 500106567 nvme1n1p1 259 1 500107608 nvme0n1 259 3 500106567 nvme0n1p1

NVMe drives/partitions not detected

Errors reported when uninstalling RPM