Hi,
I recently created a DocBook table similar to the
following one:
<table><title/>
<tgroup>
<colspec/
<thead/>
<tbody/>
</tgroup>
<tgroup>
<colspec/>
<thead/>
<tbody/>
</tgroup>
</table>
This is, of course, completely valid DocBook XML.
When I processed it to FO, it creates a fo:table that
looks like that:
<fo:table>
<fo:table-column/>
<fo:table-header/>
<fo:table-body/>
<fo:table-column/>
<fo:table-header/>
<fo:table-body/>
</fo:table>
which is not valid XSL:FO anymore.
Maybe this is a known issue, but I didn't find anything
about it in the docs or in older requests --- finding a
way to circumvent this problem would be great.
[I tried to think of a solution but did not yet come to
a conclusion.]
Best regards,
Johann Richard
Logged In: YES
user_id=81663
The semantics of multiple tgroups aren't very well defined
by CALS. I've attempted to support them in CVS (for
v1.60.0+). (By generating multiple tables and pushing them
right next to each other.)