To the author of the original bug report, if you're still
watching -- I'd like to help but I think more info is
needed. I have a very similar system (RH Fedora) and I can
run Maxima as installed from the maxima-5.9.1-1 and
maxima-exec-cmucl-5.9.1-1 rpm's (downloaded from
Sourceforge). So it looks like your environment is
different. Maybe you can give some more details to help us
get started. -- Robert Dodier
(robert_dodier@users.sourceforge.net)
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
This diagnostic appeared on at least one system because no
maxima-exec-...rpm was installed. Can be seen as a bug in
the maxima...rpm package, which fail if there is no exec.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
The maxima rpm should require a maxima-exec rpm, so that
maxima cannot be installed without maxima-exec-something;
this requirement should make the MAXIMA_PREFIX problem go
away (per comments below).
The easiest thing to do is to add a line "Requires:
maxima_exec" in maxima.spec.in after "BuildRoot:" (circa
line 27). The maxima-exec packages already have "Provides:
maxima_exec".
To get a little more fancy, we could require the version
numbers of maxima and maxima-exec to match. I am also
inclined to change maxima_exec to maxima-exec but that is a
very minor issue.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
maxima.spec now says the maxima rpm requires the
maxima-exec-foo rpm, so that's good. However (1) should make
maxima rpm depend on maxima-exec with same version number,
and (2) change maxima_exec to maxima-exec. Marking this for
followup (seems like a good time since new release coming soon).
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
maxima.spec.in has been modified to make maxima depend on
maxima-exec with the same version number (and vice versa).
So attempting to install a maxima rpm without maxima-exec
(or vv) should cause an rpm installation error (not a Maxima
run-time error). Closing this report as fixed.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: NO
[root@localhost root]# rpm -Uvh maxima-xmaxima-5.9.1-1.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
tk is needed by maxima-xmaxima-5.9.1-1
Logged In: YES
user_id=501686
To the author of the original bug report, if you're still
watching -- I'd like to help but I think more info is
needed. I have a very similar system (RH Fedora) and I can
run Maxima as installed from the maxima-5.9.1-1 and
maxima-exec-cmucl-5.9.1-1 rpm's (downloaded from
Sourceforge). So it looks like your environment is
different. Maybe you can give some more details to help us
get started. -- Robert Dodier
(robert_dodier@users.sourceforge.net)
Logged In: NO
I have the same pb. with SuSE 8.1!
Even after:
export MAXIMA_PREFIX=/usr/share/maxima/5.9.1
and variations. Tricks welcome!
kracklau@fossi.uni-weimar.de
Logged In: NO
This diagnostic appeared on at least one system because no
maxima-exec-...rpm was installed. Can be seen as a bug in
the maxima...rpm package, which fail if there is no exec.
Logged In: YES
user_id=501686
The maxima rpm should require a maxima-exec rpm, so that
maxima cannot be installed without maxima-exec-something;
this requirement should make the MAXIMA_PREFIX problem go
away (per comments below).
The easiest thing to do is to add a line "Requires:
maxima_exec" in maxima.spec.in after "BuildRoot:" (circa
line 27). The maxima-exec packages already have "Provides:
maxima_exec".
To get a little more fancy, we could require the version
numbers of maxima and maxima-exec to match. I am also
inclined to change maxima_exec to maxima-exec but that is a
very minor issue.
Logged In: YES
user_id=501686
maxima.spec now says the maxima rpm requires the
maxima-exec-foo rpm, so that's good. However (1) should make
maxima rpm depend on maxima-exec with same version number,
and (2) change maxima_exec to maxima-exec. Marking this for
followup (seems like a good time since new release coming soon).
Logged In: YES
user_id=501686
maxima.spec.in has been modified to make maxima depend on
maxima-exec with the same version number (and vice versa).
So attempting to install a maxima rpm without maxima-exec
(or vv) should cause an rpm installation error (not a Maxima
run-time error). Closing this report as fixed.