- This was origially tracker item [ 1508005 ] and has
been seperated at Fingolfins request
- ScummVM ver.: 0.9.0pre(jun 17 2006)win32snapshot
- Bug Details: in katmandu zak will walk behind the
gurus guard instead of in front of him
- How to Re-create: just walk past guard
- Lang.: English
- Ver.: 3.5 floppy version from the lucasarts classic
adventures collection
- A savegame has been attached
Hope this helps a little more, sorry about posting all
5 of these bugs in the original tracker item
katmandu guard bug
Logged In: YES
user_id=12935
Originator: NO
Are you sure this is a bug, i.e. did you compare this to the original? I can walk both in front and behind the guru guard, depending on how close to the wall I stay.
Logged In: YES
user_id=1365329
Originator: YES
Hi Fingolfin, I just checked it out again with the daily snapshot. Zaks movement now is exactly as you describe. I cant quite remember but i think zak might have been stuck walking along the back of the wall back when i reported this. To be quite honest i dont think that this is a bug anymore, actually its sort of a neat trick :).I havent been abe to get zak running in dosbox to test against the original executeable to see if its there originally.
Ultimately, if there was a problem it seems fixed now :) Thanks
Logged In: YES
user_id=1365329
Originator: YES
oops just realized i forgot to say i tested with the win32 snapshot(feb 04 07, 12:28:47)
Logged In: YES
user_id=1365329
Originator: YES
oops just realized i forgot to say i tested with the win32 snapshot(feb 04 07, 12:28:47)
Logged In: YES
user_id=991970
Originator: NO
This is not a bug, just tried it with the original and the behavior is exactly the same, i.e. Zak will walk behind the guard when he's placed next to the wall and walks towards the guard. I got a save game of this place too, if you need it. I've tested this with the floppy version, the same as the original poster used
Please close this, it's not a bug, the behavior is the same in the original interpreter
Logged In: YES
user_id=12935
Originator: NO
Thanks for testing this with the original interpreter, very helpful!