A service mesh is an infrastructure layer that manages the communication between microservices within a distributed application. It provides features such as load balancing, service discovery, traffic routing, security (such as encryption and authentication), and observability (monitoring and logging) without requiring changes to the application code. Service meshes are typically used in microservices architectures to ensure that services can communicate efficiently and securely across a network. They help with managing complex communication patterns, ensuring reliable and secure service-to-service interactions, and providing valuable insights into the health and performance of the services. Service meshes are often integrated with container orchestration platforms. Compare and read user reviews of the best Service Mesh currently available using the table below. This list is updated regularly.
Broadcom
Istio
ServiceComb
Kong
Network Service Mesh
Amazon Web Services
HashiCorp
Huawei Cloud
Solo.io
Netmaker
Traefik Labs
ARMO
Envoy Proxy
Kiali
KubeSphere
Tetrate
Kuma
Valence Security
Meshery
Cisco
Buoyant
greymatter.io
Buoyant
Service mesh is a powerful technology that enables networks of microservices to communicate and cooperate with each other more effectively. It is essentially an architectural pattern in which individual services are decoupled from one another and provided with additional capabilities such as routing, authentication, authorization, request forwarding, load balancing, fault tolerance and observability.
At its core, service mesh is essentially a network layer designed specifically for the purpose of managing communication between microservices applications. The primary goal of service mesh is to ease the operational overhead associated with managing complex distributed applications without limiting their ability to scale or taking away from their development flexibility or speed. Service meshes can also provide significant improvements in security because they can encapsulate sensitive data in-flight across multiple components or services.
Service meshes are comprised of two main components: the “data plane” (or “mesh sidecar proxy”) and the “control plane” (or “mesh control plane orchestrator”). The data plane sits alongside each instance of your application code (either in a Kubernetes pod or a VM) and serves as your communications gateway — it acts as a sidecar proxy that handles all traffic going into and out of your application instances. This includes everything from simple HTTP requests to more complex gRPC protocols. The data plane enforces any traffic rules you have defined (such as rate limits, retry policies etc.) before allowing the traffic through to its destination. The data plane also provides monitoring metrics like response time/latency information so you can accurately measure how well your service is performing over time.
The control plane manages how the different pieces of your application talk to one another by setting configurations and providing policy enforcement across many service instances at once — this helps reduce complexity by centralizing most management tasks for large distributed systems into one place where they can be managed easily and efficiently. For example, if you want to add rate limits for a certain API route across all services using that API endpoint then you can simply update one configuration instead of having to manually configure each app separately.
One way think about it is that the data plane is responsible for handling actual communication between services while the control plane sets up those connections and routes them correctly according to our desired policy configurations — like pilots guiding an airplane down its intended flight path.
There are several popular service meshes available on the market today such as Istio, Linkerd2, Consul Connect and NGINX Service Mesh — each offering slightly different approaches but largely sharing some common design principles such as separation between infrastructure concerns like networking/routing/observability etc., along with better visibility into performance metrics both at application level (through logging) or infrastructure level (through tracing).
Service meshes have become increasingly popular in recent years as companies look for ways to reduce the complexity of managing large distributed applications while also ensuring they remain secure, resilient and performant. By providing a layer of abstraction between individual services and their underlying infrastructure, service meshes can help reduce operational costs and improve the speed with which new features can be released and tested.
The cost of a service mesh depends on several factors, including the size and complexity of your system, the number of services you want to mesh, and the type of mesh implementation you choose. A basic service mesh implementation can start as low as zero (free open source solutions are available) but may increase depending on how many services and workloads you Meshify. More comprehensive implementations that offer advanced features like multi-tenancy and more granular control can cost up to tens of thousands of dollars for enterprise environments. The exact pricing for a particular instance is dependent on the scope of the project and individual requirements.
For large organizations, it's important to consider both one-time costs (such as setting up the necessary infrastructure) as well as ongoing maintenance costs (like additional support for patching, upgrades, troubleshooting etc). In addition to these costs, some providers may also charge transaction fees or subscription fees based on usage. When selecting a service mesh provider, it is important to thoroughly understand what is included in their pricing structure.
Service mesh can integrate with a variety of different types of software. This includes everything from cloud-native infrastructure, such as Kubernetes and Docker, to application frameworks like Java, .NET, Node.js, and Golang. Service mesh can also integrate with monitoring and logging services such as Prometheus and Splunk for improved visibility into system performance. Additionally, service mesh can be used to secure communication between components by integrating with identity providers such as Auth0 or Active Directory Federation Services (ADFS). Finally, service mesh is able to integrate with third-party services like RabbitMQ or Apache Kafka for an additional layer of resiliency in distributed systems architectures.
Utilize the tools given on this page to examine service mesh in terms of price, features, integrations, user reviews, and more.
First, you should think about what type of applications or services need to be managed by a service mesh. You should also consider whether you will need centralised traffic management, authentication, encryption and monitoring for these services.
Next, look at the features offered by different service meshes. Some may provide things like end-to-end authorization, advanced routing options, or customisable security policies that could be beneficial for your application. Make sure that any chosen service mesh is compatible with existing technologies and frameworks used in your environment so that integration is easy.
Finally, evaluate pricing and support options available from different companies offering service meshes. This will help you determine which offer best value for money when taking into account all of the features offered and how they fit with your particular needs.
By considering your application’s needs and the features offered by different service meshes, you will be able to make an informed choice about which one is best suited for your particular needs.