LambdaTest

Pros: LambdaTest brings with it solutions for testing our application in different clients, in a simple way, thus relieving the work of developers. It offers solutions through the SSH Tunnel functionality, in addition to an optimal integration with Trello that allowed us to organize our work management and unify functions. We adapt much better to Lambdatest than to other platforms because they are easier to use and even cheaper. It automates functions that previously developers had to do manually, which was a huge job to discover errors or why the operation is not correct, with this platform it is possible to analyze what may be coming out more or do tests where you want and evaluate the application in detail so that everything works solidly. It also has a solution that no one else offers, which is a full-page clipping, with this we have been able to visualize the errors more clearly and we have been able to find accurate solutions to the problems, together with this we have adapted our application to various clients and now it works more smoothly.

Cons: It has been difficult to manage some web drivers, as well as to correctly adapt our tests in the Safari browser, we have tried to do it on certain occasions, and we could not get it to run properly. The platform can have a little delay, it becomes slow, and it is tedious to work in this way, running the tests with the slowness of the platform becomes complicated, finding a more fluid platform would give us a greater scope for our tests. Having mobile application tests would be useful for our development, since we adapt quite well in the LambdaTest function and being able to adapt it to mobile application development would be a plus for our work.

Overall: Since we have used LambdaTest, each application that we have developed works better than the previous one, we have been able to hit the target with the errors in the operation, being able to find accurate solutions efficiently, without having to guess what it is. Likewise, the developer team has been able to automate various functions, completely limiting manual and slow work, now everything is much more efficient, Lambdatest has significantly helped us to make the work easier and more practical, although at the same time we do everything optimally. The tests of the applications are carried out without inconveniences, it is possible to evaluate their execution, in addition to the integrations it has that contribute to doing things more with less complexity and this is one of the things in which we participate the most with Lambdatest, the which is to unify the work and find the solutions we need with the integration of the appropriate platforms for this. It has helped us to take millions of steps forward without much effort and to properly implement a quality and error-free application for all our clients, where they can obtain the benefits of our services with an unprecedented user experience. Without a doubt, we achieved all this thanks to LambdaTest.

Pros: - Integrates with popular CI/CD and Project management tools
- Responsive support team available 24/7
- Quick updates.

Cons: We haven't faced any issues for now, its quite user friendly and up to our expectations .

Overall: LambdaTest has the best and quickest feedback loops which scaled up our efforts for faster delivery. Because of constant global traffic on our website, the need for us to make sure our users reach our site is highly important. Therefore, LambdaTest's geolocation testing was a charm for us, its functionalities let us test on various OS and browsers through the specific area we wanted to test in their desired capabilities generator. Also, their support team was really helpful and responsive.

Pros: - Extensive catalogue of 2000+ real browsers and operating systems.
- Provides amazing tools for responsive testing LambdaTest LT Browser for Mobile responsive testing across 50+ pre-built viewports.
- Selenium Automation Testing on cloud grid for desktop & mobile browsers.

Cons: Would be great to add more devices for Responsive testing!

Overall: While we develop our web applications, our top concern was to verify the unintentional changes to the application's visuals. We need to make sure that changing one component doesn't break the styling of another component. LambdaTest's Smart testing helped us to identify visual regression bugs for every new build.

We could capture our website screenshots belonging to different environments i.e stage and production & upload them on the LambdaTest Visual Testing platform. We were able to discover visual deviations with pixel to pixel comparison by capturing screenshots, comparing them against the baseline image, and highlighting visual changes. The slider mode is very helpful to compare the visual discrepancies between the two images by toggling them. Overall, Smart testing helped us perform reliable visual testing at scale and eliminated the risk of delivering visual bugs.

Pros: Provides effortless local testing through the Lambda Tunnel.
Share automation test reports and record videos of test sessions.
Extensive range of 2000+ real browsers and OS to test on.

Cons: Would be great if they add native application testing in their cloud ecosystem.

Overall: LambdaTest has optimized our Selenium Testing experience to deliver a seamless user experience across every browser and device. With its cloud Selenium Grid, we were able to run our test cases concurrently across thousands of desktop and mobile browsers. It helped us to reduce our test suite's build execution time by over 10x with parallel testing. We don't need to worry about updating versions, adding devices, maintaining device sanity anymore. We have been able to easily automate and continuously run all of our test cases through the CI pipeline on LambdaTest's reliable cloud infrastructure. We even use the Lambda tunnel to test our local web apps before the final web launch. The integration with Jenkins CI helped us to accelerate and deploy our quality builds faster.

Pros: The support docs are easy to understand, and the product is easy to configure and get started with.
We can compare mobile website view side by side in LT Browser. Plus, we can add custom devices as well.
Geolocation testing is a plus.
Easy integration with JIRA and more project management tools.

Cons: Yet to get native app testing. But, heard somewhere, they are going to add that soon.

Overall: We serve a variety of clients across industries, thus we need to make sure our website is accessible from every desktop, mobile browser combination they use. Responsive web design is an integral part of our testing process. As a B2B, you want to make sure that your services are always a step ahead of your customers. And to achieve that, it's important to have a tool that keeps your code and web designing process in sync with the Production.

LambdaTest's variety of browsers and local testing capabilities made it a perfect fit for our requirements. Additionally we got free access to LT Browser which is absolutely loved by our developers. We are now in a better position while tackling misbehaving websites with the help of it’s inbuilt dev tools. The best part is that LambdaTest offers an automated parallel testing that helped us achieve faster and wider test coverage over multiple browsers. Its affordable price and fast technical support made the purchase decision very easy for the team. And yes I absolutely love their support staff. They are truly available for 24*7.

Pros: The Underpass app helps to configure local test environments instantly.
LambdaTest integrates with a variety of codeless automation and CI/CD tools like LEAPWORK, TestingWhiz, CircleCI etc.
Google lighthouse report in Automation is incredible to view performance metrics of the websites.
Very pleased with how their support staff has helped us with the issues.

Cons: As of now, the lighthouse feature in Automation is only available in macOS. Would be great if they could incorporate it in more operating systems soon.

Overall: The organization we operate in has a broader audience. We need to ensure that our website is responsive, independent of our client's browser or operating system. To keep ahead of our clients, we needed a solution to ensure that our changes would render seamlessly when delivered to the market. LambdaTest has proved to be the go-to tool for us in our journey. When it comes to the latest desktop and mobile browsers, testing local pages, mobile responsive testing, LambdaTest excels at providing us all the features that our organization needed. With automated cross browser testing, we were able to reduce our test execution cycles at a minimal cost and via its integration with CircleCI we were able to continuously test our website every time a deployment is done. Big thanks to LambdaTest for their affordable pricing plans and supportive communication staff.

Pros: Stability of the platform.
Local testing app Underpass, quite a relief from unnecessary clutter of local host setup.
Up to date with latest browsers and OS like safari 14, macOS Big Sur.
Fast updates with latest browsers and good legacy browsers support.
Monday and JIRA integrations, with ability to share quick screenshots of test results and bugs.

Cons: It would be better to have more devices for screenshot testing.
Lack of mobile app testing, hope to see it soon.

Overall: To be honest, we were skeptical for any cloud infrastructure to serve our needs of flexibility, browser coverage and quick responses we benchmarked for our existing agile pipelines. But LambdaTest has been featureful and proactive enough to keep the confidence in their cloud infrastructure.

I have been seeing it for quite some time that they get us the latest desktop and mobile browsers to test on within two weeks and they are getting faster with it. We specifically wanted more machines with a specific browser configuration, and they quickly acted upon our request; moreover, easy integration with Monday helped us in quickly resolving the bugs encountered as we hate long mail trails.
It is been 10 months we are using LambdaTest and it took over all our testing needs faster than I expected

Pros: Running tests in parallel saved us cost and time
Can monitor performance audit scores of the websites in the Automation dashboard.
Export test issues in PDF and XLSX format.
Teamcity plugin to run continuous testing was really helpful.
The zoom-in feature in iOS simulators helps to find UI flaws or bugs in Real-time testing.

Cons: Would be great if they can also add more countries to their list for geolocation testing.

Overall: As technology advances, enterprises are switching from manual testing to Selenium Test Automation. But one area most enterprises are still struggling is with the scalability of running several tests in parallel. LambdaTest has been a boon for us when it comes to Selenium automation. With a Selenium Grid based on the cloud, we don't need to stress about setting up and maintaining infrastructure anymore. We can run hundreds of tests in parallel on 2000+ browsers and OS versions running on real machines. LambdaTest really helped us in reducing our web testing cost and at the same time scale it as and when required.

To leverage on marketing campaigns, we needed to ensure all our deliverables render seamlessly on different mobile and desktop browsers our users use to view them from across the world. The geolocation testing functionality helped us set the location and test our website over various locations. At LambdaTest, we can now run geolocation testing to test our website across 40+ countries. The pricing plan is pretty simple and easy to grasp, with no hidden costs at all.

Pros: LambdaTest solved our core challenge of reducing the test execution time further improving the feedback loop significantly. The ability to run tests in parallel on a cloud infrastructure is smooth. We could quickly and continuously execute hundreds of tests in our builds with the help of Circle CI LambdaTest integration. UI is very intuitive , features like test analytics, custom tags makes the job for my team easy to filter out tests results for the team.

Cons: There were a few stability issues while using simulators and we expressed the concern to the support team. Would be great to replace simulators with real devices for better efficiency.

Overall: Our overall test execution time for every release was very high, since we shifted to remote working. We had to find a solution that would help us radically reduce our test execution time and help us with faster deployments. Moreover our UI had multiple API dependencies which prompted us to leverage browser automation testing. By running tests in parallel on the LambdaTest platform we reduced our testing time from 50 minutes to 10 minutes. This really helped the team in getting faster feedback, in a better way using LambdaTest integrations and put more focus on code quality. .

Pros: - Availability of legacy browsers and OS
- Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of Browsers, OS and Country.
- Scalability of the testing process helped us deploy faster
- Free access to LT Browser to perform responsive testing
- Integrations with CI/CD tools like Jenkins and CircleCI discounted a lot of operational load.

Cons: Lambdatest needs to get native application testing, which would be a great help to my team.. We have requested the support team for this feature but it's yet to be implemented. Would also like to see more devices for screenshot testing.

Overall: Using LambdaTest we could run all our functionality tests across various browsers, OS, and resolutions. We have a significantly large user base with some users accessing the product through browsers like Internet Explorer. LambdaTest was a big help to test over those rare combinations of browsers and OS. In addition the Lambdatest helped us find minute UI misalignments and browser compatibility issues faster. Especially test automation helped us bring down the time, effort, and cost of our deployment. Thanks to the support team for being available 24*7, and solving rare hiccups, then and there.

Pros: Offers geolocation testing in automation which is amazing! You can select browsers, timezone, country and run the capability to start testing instantly. We could scale up with parallel testing on local environment without any maintenance cost. Support documentations are of good help to run tests parallely. Also offers integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Gitlab which makes our cycle easier.

Cons: Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this real soon. Would also like to test on real devices, and we have communicated the same to their support team.

Overall: LambdaTest is brilliant. The ease of testing locally hosted URLs over hundreds of browsers & operating systems without worrying about infrastructure issues has led us to deliver better softwares, faster!

Using LambdaTest Selenium Grid, we have radically reduced the manual testing effort while ensuring our web application's cross-browser compatibility. It's crucial for us (as a healthcare provider) to make sure that there are no errors. We had to incorporate a lot of changes due to COVID-19 and our in-house infrastructure plateaued the testing cycles, delaying our go-to-market. That’s where LambdaTest came to pull us through.

Leveraging LambdaTest cloud infrastructure, we could scale our automation test cycles without much of a struggle. Our automation team could execute Selenium scripts in their preferred language, and the ability to test parallely helped us optimize our continuous deployment. Thanks to LambdaTest, we can find more critical bugs with less manual testing efforts.

Pros: LambdaTest Grid integrates with a variety of CI/CD tools. It provides a variety of browsers, OS, devices, all on cloud. Consistent with browser updates when new versions are released, they even provide beta versions of browsers. Affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions. Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from 5 hours when executed in parallel on multiple VM’s. This has been extremely helpful!

Cons: Their smart testing module needs improvement. We also hope they could come up with some API for automated visual regression testing. One more thing would be it would be good to see if LambdaTest can get real devices to test for mobile automation. I think these features and improvements will be a robust fix to the product.

Overall: We have been using LambdaTest for almost 6 months now. Back then, we were thinking of implementing shift left testing to catch bugs ASAP. With browser testing being one of the most rigorous and time-consuming validations, we were looking for a solution that could help us achieve continuous testing through our GitLab CI/CD pipeline. That is when we landed over a webinar of LambdaTest which demonstrated setting up GitLab CI/CD and integrating it with their cloud. We thought of giving the integration a go and it worked like a charm.

We were able to leverage the Git based triggers to execute our CI/CD pipeline. So every time a new commit was pushed from our end, the pipeline ran an automated build over the LambdaTest Grid, which allowed us to ensure our UI on every major and minor release with access to numerous browsers, platforms and devices. Integrating LambdaTest in our GitLab CI/CD pipeline allowed us to deploy quality builds faster. In the new normal where companies are forced to perform remote testing due to COVID-19, a cloud based solution like LambdaTest has been a life-saver. It gives us the flexibility to run tests from anywhere at any time without being bothered about maintaining an inhouse infrastructure.

Pros: - Easily integrates with leading tools like JIRA, Asana, Jenkins, CircleCI
- Documentations adds a good support to get started
- Local testing is faster with CircleCI Orb
- Extensive range of browsers and devices to test on

Cons: - Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, where as the LT browser is much better to use
- Had few slugs in the early stage of implementation while running parallel tests, however the support team was helpful to resolve it.

Overall: Running tests serially can be a good option when your product is at an early stage. But as we scaled the product, we needed a tool to reduce test time execution and pace up our test cycles. LambdaTest simplified the Selenium testing experience for us with their cloud based platform which allowed us to execute our test cases in parallel on hundreds of browsers. We could easily automate the test cases, get the sessions recorded and share the test reports across the team for assessment using Asana integration. We even leverage the integration with CircleCI to run automated tests on LambdaTest through our pipeline. The CircleCI Orb is handy for testing our privately hosted application.

It’s good to see now that using LambdaTest we could run multiple tests on multiple VM’s, saving us hours of testing time and maintenance cost of local infrastructure.

Personally, one thing that LambdaTest does very well is continuing to provide tutorials for testing, so that we stay up to speed and are even able to learn new things.I definitely saw myself applying a lot of the new concepts that I learned from their blogs.

Pros: -Does not burn your pocket, an affordable testing platform.
-Third party integrations with project management, CI CD tools
-Underpass to test local pages with ease.
-Offers extensions for Azure pipelines, Docker for local testing
-Capture videos, automate screenshots and share it with the team.
-Helpful and supercharged support team

Cons: -For mobile testing, Emulators are good but would be better to have some real devices too.

Overall: Optimizing our pre-prod testing process was the need of an hour for my team. We required a solution that would help us be consistent with testing in each sprint. Using LambdaTest, we could run local tests for our web-application on varied combinations of browsers and platforms through virtual machines hosted on cloud. Underpass app was a great help here to launch tunnel connection in no time without any command line calls. With LambdaTest, we are able to deliver a browser compatible experience to our visitors. Good to see it integrates with ClickUp, raising a bug ticket was never so easy.

Pros: -Support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily
-Underpass app provides one click launch to test on dev environments.
-LT browser offers a comparison view with pre-set mobile devices. Plus, we can add custom devices to it.
-Location based tests helped us provide unified experience to our customers.
-Integrations with Bamboo CI was an add on benefit

Cons: - Can’t do native-app testing as they offer simulation for web testing only. However, from what I have heard they are promising to go live with it shortly.

Overall: The industry we function (e-commerce) has a broad category of audience. We need to make sure our website is accessible to everyone irrespective of the browser / operating system they use. Of course, responsive web design check is a major bullet point over our testing checklist as well. As a B2C, it's crucial for us to stay ahead of the customers and we wanted a solution which could help us ensure our changes would work seamlessly when shipped to the Production.

LambdaTest made a great fit here when considered the latest browsers on the product, ability to test local pages along with a complimentary access to LT browser which is an absolute delight for our developers and testers. It helps us save a considerable effort on responsive testing plus the native developer tools allow us to dig deep into any UI mismatch! Also As mentioned we could achieve wider test coverage in time by running multiple combinations of browsers in parallel with LambdaTest automation suite. Our director to purchase the subscription was due to their affordable pricing for the parallel tests and the communication from the support team!

Pros: >Docker Tunnel for local testing on multiple instances parallely
>Integration with Jira & Slack
>Always up-to-date with latest browsers for both desktop and mobile
>An active support team to help out
>Custom tags for automation builds to help us filter our test builds.

Cons: Analytics could be better, as of now it gives basic information on test status and build status. It would be better if I could analyze groups of tests which are taking longer time to complete, to pin-point use cases which could lead to slowness in user journey. Also, would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing.

Overall: When pandemic demanded us to work from home, it was a daunting situation for us. Keeping up with the consistent growth since a year, we had few feature launches ready to be deployed on prod environments. But testing them was a challenge while working remotely and with a large team of testers and developers.

LambdaTest is a saving soldier for our company by offering us thousands of browsers & platforms to test on cloud. We are able to ensure a sturdy UI without worrying about infra management. Plus points for docker extension where we could locally test on multiple instances through Lambda Tunnel using Docker. This helped us align better with our DevOps team, kept our projects on track and allowed us to implement continuous deployment with robust quality checks.

Pros: >Underpass app, very helpful for local testing on development environment
>Stability is good, downtimes are notified if any
>Up to date with latest browsers and OS like safari 14, macOS big sur
>Integrations with Monday, Jira, and more prominent tools

Cons: >Need more devices for screenshot testing .
>Would love to see mobile application testing.

Overall: Initially we were skeptical whether a cloud infrastructure would be able to give us the flexibility, speed and browser coverage we need for our agile sprints. But LambdaTest has been a complete value for money to us.

They usually get the latest browsers on-board under 2 weeks time and are never compromising the experience over legacy browsers at the same time. The machines are quick to load and we rely heavily over the Monday integration, it helps us share screenshots instantly among ourselves without having to be stuck in long email chains.

We have been using LambdaTest for around 8 months and it has been so far so good.

Pros: *Support team is very active
*Extensions to perform testing with CI/CD tools like Azure pipelines
*Offers 70+ integrations, glad to see it integrates with CircleCI and Asana
*Affordable pricing option
*Always up to date with latest browsers

Cons: *Cypress integration is missing
*Native App testing is not available yet

Overall: LambdaTest has made our testing process less tedious with automated parallel testing. Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple hours. Parallel testing has helped us with faster feedback loops to scale up our go to market efforts.

Having a global user base we have active traffic from varied locations and testing on multiple platforms and browsers is a continuous process for the team. The feature that stands out for us is geolocation testing, all you need to do is run the capabilities and test the website for the desired location. We use Azure Pipelines for CI/CD and LambdaTest extension for Azure has helped us get a seamless testing experience for our privately hosted projects. Thanks to that we are now able to easily ensure browser compatibility for all the changes before we move them to Prod. Kudos to the team!

Pros: What really helped us improve our delivery cycle was live debugging while you automate the tests. We could break the script execution at any point and take it over from there by interactive live for the remaining test steps. LambdaTest also provides video recording and screenshots of all your tests in their test logs which makes tracking easier. Offers integrations with Jira, Jenkins which ensures us better collaboration and robust CI/CD pipeline respectively, which is an additional plus for us.

Cons: The analytics over automation dashboard can be more intuitive. Good part is that we have relayed some of our suggestions to the support and as per their support team those suggestions are to be considered as a part of their upcoming sprint so we are just excited to see them onboard soon.

Overall: As a Fintech company, other than Chrome and Safari, we need to test our website regularly on IE and Edge as well, as our customers are dependent on legacy OS to use our web-application. LambdaTest Selenium Grid has helped us radically reduce the manual testing effort and ensure browser compatibility. Our automation engineers are able to execute Selenium scripts in their preferred language, the cloud infrastructure has allowed us to scale our automation test cycles effortlessly. A majority of our regression suites are now automated, thanks to LambdaTest as we are now able to find more critical bugs with less manual testing efforts.

Pros: - Detailed documentation, helps you with quick implementation.
- APIs for extracting test run data like logs and run video
- Good community to help to dig deep for possible outcomes.
- Screenshot testing feature
- Integration with Jira

Cons: There is a latency in a single test when compared to a local machine. Maybe because of the cloud? So you have to run in parallel to cut down on testing times.

Overall: Have been using LambdaTest for around 1 year now, and could say that it’s a useful testing tool for our team. Offering great combinations of browsers and operating systems for you to test on and most importantly there are many types of additional logs that come with each test which helps in debugging.. Glad to see the integration with Travis CI due to which we could optimally use this tool with our CI CD pipelines directly. We were able to effectively run TestNG and Selenium tests using their documentation and as an added advantage their support team is quick and helpful.