Sweepatic vs. ThreatLocker Comparison Chart

Pros

• Great for the protection it offers and provides great visibility and insight into what is permitted in our environment. Highly recommend for protecting your environment with multiple tools at your disposal.
• - Ease of use - Great support. Never waiting more than a few minutes for live support - Great feature - Active development. Regular feature updates - Much better alternative to App Locker
• ThreatLocker takes an effective zero trust approach to application and network access. Onboarding customers is very straight-forward thanks to learning mode, and approving items that were incorrectly denied access is very straight-forward. The Cyber Hero support team are very attentive in getting any issues resolved quickly.
• Vendor Support is the best in the business! Features that it provides are incredibly easy to use and effective. Application Control is something all Cyber Security teams need to have in their Security Stacks and Provides so much control over what applications are allow into your environment Their EDR is incredibly Lightweight in comparison to some of its competitors.
• We love the support team at ThreatLocker. They are concise and geared with answers to every question imaginable.
• ThreatLocker is a very reliable product that our company has been using for quite some time. It has successfully caught numerous threats and prevented us from falling victim to various cyber attacks.
• ThreatLocker impresses with its intuitive interface, catering well to both agents and end users alike. Deploying the solution across our environment was straightforward, ensuring security for our endpoints and servers. The product excels in providing robust security features and comprehensive control, making it a standout choice for implementing a zero-trust model. Support and account management are exemplary, consistently exceeding industry standards.
• ThreatLocker is a beautiful product, the greatest ever seen. I am in awe of what they have managed to do with their product.
• Does an extremely good job of preventing problematic applications from either taking over or accessing information they shouldn't. Ringfencing prevents applications that have no need for lateral movement from doing so. Adopting a zero-trust methodology fixes a major security flaw in that it prevents problems before they start, for the minor inconvenience of getting unknown things approved first. Automated privilege escalation is one of the best features; if a user is installing an app that requires admin privileges, you can approve automatic escalation for a period of time for that installer and no credentials are needed to be passed to the user.
• The ease of use on implementation, and troubleshooting. Have more control over the environment without requiring a Team dedicated to reviewing logs and taking action.