Muse

Muse

Microsoft
+
+

Related Products

  • Daylight
    10 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Crowdin
    922 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Servers.com by Nexcess
    15 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Sumsub
    226 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • JetBrains Junie
    12 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Hotspot Shield
    121 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Google AI Studio
    30 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
    985 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Auvik
    673 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Couchbase
    412 Ratings
    Visit Website

About

Microsoft has unveiled Muse, a groundbreaking generative AI model designed to revolutionize gameplay ideation. Developed in collaboration with Ninja Theory, Muse is a World and Human Action Model (WHAM) trained on data from the game Bleeding Edge. This AI model possesses a comprehensive understanding of 3D game environments, including physics and player interactions, enabling it to generate consistent and diverse gameplay sequences. Muse can produce game visuals and predict controller actions, facilitating rapid prototyping and creative exploration for game developers. By analyzing over 1 billion images and actions, Muse demonstrates the potential to assist in game preservation by recreating classic titles for modern platforms. While still in the early stages, with current outputs at a resolution of 300×180 pixels, Muse represents a significant advancement in integrating AI into the game development process, aiming to enhance, not replace, human creativity.

About

Muse Spark 1.2 is Meta’s coding-focused model update designed to power Muse Code and improve software engineering workflows. The model is built for code generation, complex debugging, codebase understanding, long-horizon development tasks, and end-to-end developer workflows. Muse Spark 1.2 was co-trained with Muse Code to improve performance inside the terminal coding agent environment. It supports planning, goal conditioning, context compaction, subagent coordination, and iterative coding workflows across large repositories. The model was trained with expanded coding compute, diverse development environments, self-improvement loops, and long-running engineering tasks. Built for AI developers and software teams, Muse Spark 1.2 helps agents plan, write, validate, debug, and optimize code with greater autonomy.

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Audience

Game developers wanting a tool to streamline prototyping and explore new gameplay concepts through AI-generated sequences

Audience

AI developers, software engineers, coding agent builders, research teams, platform teams, DevOps teams, ML engineers, enterprise development teams, and organizations that need code generation, debugging, codebase understanding, long-horizon coding, terminal agents, subagent coordination, repository automation, kernel optimization, and end-to-end developer workflow support

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

API

Offers API

API

Offers API

Screenshots and Videos

Screenshots and Videos

Pricing

No information available.
Free Version
Free Trial

Pricing

$1.25 per 1M tokens (input)
$1.25 per million tokens in input, and $4.25 per million tokens of output
Free Version
Free Trial

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 0.0 / 5
ease 0.0 / 5
features 0.0 / 5
design 0.0 / 5
support 0.0 / 5

This software hasn't been reviewed yet. Be the first to provide a review:

Review this Software

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5
features 5.0 / 5
design 5.0 / 5

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Muse Spark 1.2 looks like a big step up for developers because it is clearly aimed at real software engineering work, not just casual code suggestions. The fact that it powers Muse Code makes it feel more practical right away, especially for terminal-based workflows where the model can help write code, validate changes, and work through bigger tasks. I like that Meta seems to be pushing hard into agentic coding. Earlier Muse Spark versions were already positioned around multimodal reasoning, tool use, and visual coding, and 1.2 feels like the more developer-focused evolution of that direction. The cost angle is interesting too. Reports mention Muse Code having multiple pricing tiers, including a cheaper option, which could matter a lot for developers running coding agents frequently instead of only using AI once in a while.

Cons

  • It is still new and tied to a beta coding agent, so I would not trust it blindly yet. I would want to test it on real repos, messy bugs, failing tests, multi-file edits, and longer agent runs before making it part of my daily stack. Meta also still has to prove the developer experience. A strong model is one thing, but coding agents live or die on tooling, speed, reliability, permissions, logs, diffs, and how well they recover when something breaks.

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Company Information

Microsoft
Founded: 1975
United States
microsoft.com

Company Information

Meta
Founded: 2004
United States
meta.ai

Alternatives

Unity Muse

Unity Muse

Unity Technologies

Alternatives

Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5

Claude Mythos 5

Anthropic

Categories

Categories

Integrations

C
C#
Codex CLI
Dart
Hermes Agent
Hugging Face
Meta Model API
Muse Video
OpenAI Agents SDK
OpenAI Codex
OpenClaw
OpenCode
Python
Ruby
Rust
SQL
Scala
Solidity
WhatsApp
XML

Integrations

C
C#
Codex CLI
Dart
Hermes Agent
Hugging Face
Meta Model API
Muse Video
OpenAI Agents SDK
OpenAI Codex
OpenClaw
OpenCode
Python
Ruby
Rust
SQL
Scala
Solidity
WhatsApp
XML
Claim Muse and update features and information
Claim Muse and update features and information
Claim Muse Spark 1.2 and update features and information
Claim Muse Spark 1.2 and update features and information