+
+

Related Products

  • JetBrains Junie
    12 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • BAND
    3 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Retool
    584 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
    985 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Google AI Studio
    30 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Aikido Security
    238 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Planview ProjectAdvantage
    121 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Planview AdaptiveWork
    714 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Checksum.ai
    1 Rating
    Visit Website
  • Creatio
    570 Ratings
    Visit Website

About

Muse Code is Meta’s terminal coding agent, powered by Muse Spark 1.2, for handling complex software engineering tasks across large repositories. The agent can plan changes, write code, validate results, and coordinate multiple persistent subagents during development sessions. Muse Code uses async background agents that stay active throughout a session to reduce repeated information gathering and help complete multi-step tasks with less steering. Its runtime uses a local event log that records model calls, tool runs, approvals, and edits so sessions can be replayed and resumed after failures. Muse Code includes bundled skills such as /plan for approval-gated planning, /grill for stress-testing plans, and /goal for working toward completion. Built for AI developers and software teams, Muse Code helps automate coding workflows, long-running engineering tasks, debugging, and repository-level development.

About

Muse Spark 1.2 is Meta’s coding-focused model update designed to power Muse Code and improve software engineering workflows. The model is built for code generation, complex debugging, codebase understanding, long-horizon development tasks, and end-to-end developer workflows. Muse Spark 1.2 was co-trained with Muse Code to improve performance inside the terminal coding agent environment. It supports planning, goal conditioning, context compaction, subagent coordination, and iterative coding workflows across large repositories. The model was trained with expanded coding compute, diverse development environments, self-improvement loops, and long-running engineering tasks. Built for AI developers and software teams, Muse Spark 1.2 helps agents plan, write, validate, debug, and optimize code with greater autonomy.

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Audience

Software engineers, AI developers, coding agent users, platform teams, DevOps teams, ML engineers, research teams, enterprise development teams, and organizations that need terminal coding agents, repository automation, code generation, debugging, validation, persistent subagents, replay-safe execution, long-running coding workflows, and end-to-end software development support

Audience

AI developers, software engineers, coding agent builders, research teams, platform teams, DevOps teams, ML engineers, enterprise development teams, and organizations that need code generation, debugging, codebase understanding, long-horizon coding, terminal agents, subagent coordination, repository automation, kernel optimization, and end-to-end developer workflow support

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

API

Offers API

API

Offers API

Screenshots and Videos

Screenshots and Videos

Pricing

$1.25 per 1M tokens (input)
Standard pricing: $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens

Discounted "contributor" tier costing $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens for users who agree to share feedback to improve the AI.
Free Version
Free Trial

Pricing

$1.25 per 1M tokens (input)
$1.25 per million tokens in input, and $4.25 per million tokens of output
Free Version
Free Trial

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5
features 5.0 / 5
design 5.0 / 5

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Muse Code looks exciting because Meta is finally going after coding agents directly, not just releasing another general AI model. A terminal-based agent that can write code, inspect software, run tests, and validate changes is exactly the kind of workflow developers actually care about. The pricing angle is a big deal. Meta is pitching Muse Code as one of the more affordable coding agents, with a lower-cost tier that is reportedly less than one-tenth the cost of its general Muse Spark model. That matters if you use coding agents all day instead of just for the occasional refactor. I also like that it is powered by Muse Spark 1.2, which sounds more focused on software engineering than earlier Muse Spark releases. If Meta can make the agent reliable inside real repos, Muse Code could become a serious daily tool.

Cons

  • It is still in beta, so I would not trust it blindly yet. Coding agents need to prove themselves on messy codebases, failing tests, weird dependencies, security-sensitive changes, and long multi-step tasks. I would also want to see more independent developer feedback. Meta’s pricing and positioning are interesting, but the real test is whether Muse Code can consistently make good changes without wasting time or creating cleanup work.

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Muse Spark 1.2 looks like a big step up for developers because it is clearly aimed at real software engineering work, not just casual code suggestions. The fact that it powers Muse Code makes it feel more practical right away, especially for terminal-based workflows where the model can help write code, validate changes, and work through bigger tasks. I like that Meta seems to be pushing hard into agentic coding. Earlier Muse Spark versions were already positioned around multimodal reasoning, tool use, and visual coding, and 1.2 feels like the more developer-focused evolution of that direction. The cost angle is interesting too. Reports mention Muse Code having multiple pricing tiers, including a cheaper option, which could matter a lot for developers running coding agents frequently instead of only using AI once in a while.

Cons

  • It is still new and tied to a beta coding agent, so I would not trust it blindly yet. I would want to test it on real repos, messy bugs, failing tests, multi-file edits, and longer agent runs before making it part of my daily stack. Meta also still has to prove the developer experience. A strong model is one thing, but coding agents live or die on tooling, speed, reliability, permissions, logs, diffs, and how well they recover when something breaks.

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Company Information

Meta
Founded: 2004
United States
meta.ai

Company Information

Meta
Founded: 2004
United States
meta.ai

Alternatives

Claude Code

Claude Code

Anthropic

Alternatives

Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5

Anthropic
Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5

Claude Mythos 5

Anthropic

Categories

Categories

Integrations

Meta AI
Muse Spark
Claude Agent SDK
Codex CLI
Continue
Gray Swan
Hermes Agent
Java
Kubernetes
LlamaIndex
Meta Model API
Muse Code
Muse Image
Muse Spark 1.2
OpenAI Agents SDK
PowerShell
Ruby
TypeScript
Vercel AI SDK
WhatsApp

Integrations

Meta AI
Muse Spark
Claude Agent SDK
Codex CLI
Continue
Gray Swan
Hermes Agent
Java
Kubernetes
LlamaIndex
Meta Model API
Muse Code
Muse Image
Muse Spark 1.2
OpenAI Agents SDK
PowerShell
Ruby
TypeScript
Vercel AI SDK
WhatsApp
Claim Muse Code and update features and information
Claim Muse Code and update features and information
Claim Muse Spark 1.2 and update features and information
Claim Muse Spark 1.2 and update features and information