Kane CLI

Kane CLI

TestMu AI
+
+

Related Products

  • QA Wolf
    269 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Checksum.ai
    1 Rating
    Visit Website
  • Virtuoso QA
    131 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Parasoft
    150 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • MuukTest
    34 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • JetBrains Junie
    12 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
    999 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • NetBrain
    285 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Google AI Studio
    30 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Signalmash
    16 Ratings
    Visit Website

About

Kane CLI is the terminal-native AI testing tool from TestMu AI (formerly LambdaTest). It runs from any terminal, IDE or CI pipeline — and as a first-class skill inside AI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex CLI and Gemini CLI. Describe what should happen in plain English: "log in, add a laptop to the cart, apply SAVE10, verify the total." Kane CLI drives a real Chrome browser, executes the flow step by step, and returns deterministic pass or fail with a shareable evidence link. No selectors, no boilerplate, no test framework to stand up first. Built for two audiences at once. Developers, QA engineers, PMs and vibe coders verify a feature before the PR, before the QA cycle, before deploy. AI coding agents use it as a verification primitive: they can build a feature from a prompt but cannot confirm it works in a real browser. Kane CLI closes that loop, and installs with one command.

About

Muse Code is Meta’s terminal coding agent, powered by Muse Spark 1.2, for handling complex software engineering tasks across large repositories. The agent can plan changes, write code, validate results, and coordinate multiple persistent subagents during development sessions. Muse Code uses async background agents that stay active throughout a session to reduce repeated information gathering and help complete multi-step tasks with less steering. Its runtime uses a local event log that records model calls, tool runs, approvals, and edits so sessions can be replayed and resumed after failures. Muse Code includes bundled skills such as /plan for approval-gated planning, /grill for stress-testing plans, and /goal for working toward completion. Built for AI developers and software teams, Muse Code helps automate coding workflows, long-running engineering tasks, debugging, and repository-level development.

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Audience

Software developers, QA engineers, SDETs, product managers, DevOps teams, and AI coding agent users

Audience

Software engineers, AI developers, coding agent users, platform teams, DevOps teams, ML engineers, research teams, enterprise development teams, and organizations that need terminal coding agents, repository automation, code generation, debugging, validation, persistent subagents, replay-safe execution, long-running coding workflows, and end-to-end software development support

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

API

Offers API

API

Offers API

Screenshots and Videos

No images available

Screenshots and Videos

Pricing

$17/month
Free Version
Free Trial

Pricing

$1.25 per 1M tokens (input)
Standard pricing: $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens

Discounted "contributor" tier costing $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens for users who agree to share feedback to improve the AI.
Free Version
Free Trial

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 0.0 / 5
ease 0.0 / 5
features 0.0 / 5
design 0.0 / 5
support 0.0 / 5

This software hasn't been reviewed yet. Be the first to provide a review:

Review this Software

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Muse Code looks exciting because Meta is finally going after coding agents directly, not just releasing another general AI model. A terminal-based agent that can write code, inspect software, run tests, and validate changes is exactly the kind of workflow developers actually care about. The pricing angle is a big deal. Meta is pitching Muse Code as one of the more affordable coding agents, with a lower-cost tier that is reportedly less than one-tenth the cost of its general Muse Spark model. That matters if you use coding agents all day instead of just for the occasional refactor. I also like that it is powered by Muse Spark 1.2, which sounds more focused on software engineering than earlier Muse Spark releases. If Meta can make the agent reliable inside real repos, Muse Code could become a serious daily tool.

Cons

  • It is still in beta, so I would not trust it blindly yet. Coding agents need to prove themselves on messy codebases, failing tests, weird dependencies, security-sensitive changes, and long multi-step tasks. I would also want to see more independent developer feedback. Meta’s pricing and positioning are interesting, but the real test is whether Muse Code can consistently make good changes without wasting time or creating cleanup work.

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Company Information

TestMu AI
Founded: 2026
United States
www.testmuai.com/kane-cli/

Company Information

Meta
Founded: 2004
United States
meta.ai

Alternatives

TestMu AI

TestMu AI

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Alternatives

Claude Code

Claude Code

Anthropic
Poolside

Poolside

Poolside.ai
Kimi Code CLI

Kimi Code CLI

Moonshot AI
Enter Code

Enter Code

Converge AI

Categories

Categories

Integrations

Meta AI
Muse Glimmer
Muse Spark
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.2
TestMu AI

Integrations

Meta AI
Muse Glimmer
Muse Spark
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.2
TestMu AI
Claim Kane CLI and update features and information
Claim Kane CLI and update features and information
Claim Muse Code and update features and information
Claim Muse Code and update features and information