Amp

Amp

Amp Code
+
+

Related Products

  • JetBrains Junie
    12 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Retool
    593 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Google AI Studio
    30 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
    999 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Aikido Security
    239 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • BAND
    3 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Checksum.ai
    1 Rating
    Visit Website
  • Pensero
    2 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Creatio
    586 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • JAMS
    279 Ratings
    Visit Website

About

Amp is a frontier coding agent built to give developers full access to the power of today’s leading AI models directly in their workflow. Available in the terminal and popular editors like VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains, and Neovim, Amp integrates seamlessly into existing development environments. It enables developers to delegate complex coding tasks, refactors, reviews, and explorations to intelligent agents that understand and operate across entire codebases. With support for advanced models such as Claude Opus, Gemini, and GPT-class models, Amp delivers fast, reliable, and highly agentic code generation. The platform is designed for real-world engineering work, handling multi-file changes, deep context, and iterative improvements. Amp helps developers move faster while maintaining confidence in code quality.

About

Save time and effort by assigning smaller tickets to an AI agent. Tusk helps software engineers complete chore tickets at the speed of thought. Tusk automatically iterates on its code changes to address any code reviews left on the pull request. No good engineer pushes code without testing. Tusk runs your automated checks and tests to make sure the PR works. If we can’t create a pull request, we’ll still save you time by providing code context as a jumping-off point. With Tusk, you can avoid getting distracted by your PMs over chore tickets. Focus your time on fulfilling work, while also raising the bar on your product. Customer-reported bugs can be time-consuming to investigate and tackle. Let Tusk have the first pass at fixing them. We know you have better things to do than removing a word in a header or finding and replacing a term across multiple files. Have Tusk go through your product quality backlog. We'll implement the UI/UX changes that you've been neglecting for weeks.

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Audience

Amp is built for professional software developers, engineers, and technical teams who want an advanced AI coding agent to handle complex codebases, accelerate development, and enable more ambitious engineering workflows

Audience

Product teams requiring a tool to automate and complete UI changes from ticket to pull request

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

API

Offers API

API

Offers API

Screenshots and Videos

Screenshots and Videos

Pricing

Free
Free Version
Free Trial

Pricing

$495 per month
Free Version
Free Trial

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 4.7 / 5
ease 4.7 / 5
features 4.3 / 5
design 4.0 / 5
support 4.7 / 5

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 0.0 / 5
ease 0.0 / 5
features 0.0 / 5
design 0.0 / 5
support 0.0 / 5

This software hasn't been reviewed yet. Be the first to provide a review:

Review this Software

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Good integration with Pycharm, unit tests support, solving quickly programming challenges. The biggest pros -> reading whole source code project and proposing the answer based on the rest of the code.
  • Takes the context of your code to give you answers, the vscode extension is awesome and support was incredibly fast when I had an issue.
  • Amp was easy to get started with and it's very intuitive to use. This has been a nice alternative to coding with ChatGPT up in a browser where I have to copy and paste my code back and forth. I'm a big fan of the preset prompts as there are a few I would never have thought of asking.

Cons

  • Not following the pattern in a single chat even. F.ex. if I polish the tests to be using that framework or that way to mock it for one set of tests, for next method, it is forgetting my earlier "style".
  • Sometimes the context is not that accurate, and the latest version came out bugged
  • Not too many drawbacks outside of the general limitations of the AI. There have been a couple of times I've asked it to rewrite code for me and I had to prompt it to get it to give me an example in actual code vs just advice about how to improve the code.

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Company Information

Amp Code
United States
ampcode.com

Company Information

Tusk
United States
usetusk.ai/

Alternatives

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains

Alternatives

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains
Kimi Code CLI

Kimi Code CLI

Moonshot AI
Devin Desktop

Devin Desktop

Cognition
Claude Code

Claude Code

Anthropic
Cline

Cline

Cline AI Coding Agent

Categories

Categories

Integrations

GitHub
React
Bitbucket
Claude Mythos 5
Claude Sonnet 3.7
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.2 Instant
GPT-5.3 Instant
GPT-5.6 Luna
Gemini 3 Deep Think
Gemini Flash
Git
GraphQL
Lua
Objective-C
Pascal
Python
Ruby
Swift
YAML

Integrations

GitHub
React
Bitbucket
Claude Mythos 5
Claude Sonnet 3.7
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.2 Instant
GPT-5.3 Instant
GPT-5.6 Luna
Gemini 3 Deep Think
Gemini Flash
Git
GraphQL
Lua
Objective-C
Pascal
Python
Ruby
Swift
YAML
Claim Amp and update features and information
Claim Amp and update features and information
Claim Tusk and update features and information
Claim Tusk and update features and information