Amp

Amp

Amp Code
+
+

Related Products

  • JetBrains Junie
    12 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Retool
    593 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Google AI Studio
    30 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
    999 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Aikido Security
    239 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • BAND
    3 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Checksum.ai
    1 Rating
    Visit Website
  • Pensero
    2 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Creatio
    586 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • JAMS
    279 Ratings
    Visit Website

About

Amp is a frontier coding agent built to give developers full access to the power of today’s leading AI models directly in their workflow. Available in the terminal and popular editors like VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains, and Neovim, Amp integrates seamlessly into existing development environments. It enables developers to delegate complex coding tasks, refactors, reviews, and explorations to intelligent agents that understand and operate across entire codebases. With support for advanced models such as Claude Opus, Gemini, and GPT-class models, Amp delivers fast, reliable, and highly agentic code generation. The platform is designed for real-world engineering work, handling multi-file changes, deep context, and iterative improvements. Amp helps developers move faster while maintaining confidence in code quality.

About

Cursor is an AI coding agent and development platform for building ambitious software faster. The platform lets developers hand off tasks to agents that can build, test, demo, and prepare features for review. Cursor supports autonomous and parallel agent workflows, including cloud agents that can work on multiple tasks across repositories. It runs across the editor, terminal, Slack, and GitHub, helping teams automate coding, code review, PR workflows, and repetitive engineering work. Cursor also lets users choose from leading AI models for different tasks, including models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, SpaceXAI, and Cursor. Built for developers, engineering teams, and enterprises, Cursor helps accelerate software development while keeping humans focused on decisions and review.

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Audience

Amp is built for professional software developers, engineers, and technical teams who want an advanced AI coding agent to handle complex codebases, accelerate development, and enable more ambitious engineering workflows

Audience

Developers, engineering teams, software companies, startups, enterprise engineering organizations, product teams, DevOps teams, AI coding teams, code reviewers, and technical leaders that need AI coding agents, autonomous development, cloud agents, parallel task execution, code review, CLI workflows, Slack collaboration, GitHub integration, model choice, automations, and secure software development at scale

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

API

Offers API

API

Offers API

Screenshots and Videos

Screenshots and Videos

Pricing

Free
Free Version
Free Trial

Pricing

$20/month
Free Version
Free Trial

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 4.7 / 5
ease 4.7 / 5
features 4.3 / 5
design 4.0 / 5
support 4.7 / 5

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5
features 5.0 / 5
design 5.0 / 5
support 5.0 / 5

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Good integration with Pycharm, unit tests support, solving quickly programming challenges. The biggest pros -> reading whole source code project and proposing the answer based on the rest of the code.
  • Takes the context of your code to give you answers, the vscode extension is awesome and support was incredibly fast when I had an issue.
  • Amp was easy to get started with and it's very intuitive to use. This has been a nice alternative to coding with ChatGPT up in a browser where I have to copy and paste my code back and forth. I'm a big fan of the preset prompts as there are a few I would never have thought of asking.

Cons

  • Not following the pattern in a single chat even. F.ex. if I polish the tests to be using that framework or that way to mock it for one set of tests, for next method, it is forgetting my earlier "style".
  • Sometimes the context is not that accurate, and the latest version came out bugged
  • Not too many drawbacks outside of the general limitations of the AI. There have been a couple of times I've asked it to rewrite code for me and I had to prompt it to get it to give me an example in actual code vs just advice about how to improve the code.

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Cursor is one of the best AI coding tools because it feels built around how developers actually work. It is not just autocomplete; it can understand a repo, make edits, explain code, help debug, and work through bigger tasks with an agentic workflow. I like that it combines the familiar feel of a code editor with deeper AI features like Agent mode, project rules, MCP, skills, and CLI support. That makes it useful for everyday coding, but also flexible enough for more advanced workflows. The model options and pricing controls are also helpful. Being able to choose stronger or cheaper models depending on the task makes Cursor easier to fit into a real development routine.
  • I'm a novice to intermediate programmer and I've always felt a bit overwhelmed by editors. I've been learning to code by copy and pasting a million times into chatgpt. Switching to cursor saves me so much time, and I love how easy it is to give it the context. It has this awesome feature where you can upload docs into it and it can go pull the docs when answering questions, which was one of my biggest pain points as a user when AI would give me old docs or out of date code. Another epic feature was the natural language terminal commands, which have allowed me to get through projects i previously would get stuck on.

Cons

  • I don't have any cons about Cursor. Use it daily in my development.
  • No IDE is perfect, but this one is by far my favorite. I think most of the cons lie in the limitations of the AI models right now. I think the code interpreter is a littley sketchy to use becuase it's hard to see exactly what code its suggesting I change so I ran into some issues when using it without double checking the work, but it also saved me in a couple spots I got stuck.

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Company Information

Amp Code
United States
ampcode.com

Company Information

Cursor
Founded: 2022
United States
www.cursor.com

Alternatives

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains

Alternatives

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains
Kimi Code CLI

Kimi Code CLI

Moonshot AI
Bolt.new

Bolt.new

StackBlitz
Claude Code

Claude Code

Anthropic
Devin Desktop

Devin Desktop

Cognition
Cline

Cline

Cline AI Coding Agent
Amp

Amp

Amp Code

Categories

Categories

Integrations

Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.5
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Sonnet 3.7
Claude Sonnet 4
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.6
GLM-5.2
GPT-4.1
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-6
Gemini 3 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.1 Pro
OpenAI
Slack
XHawk

Integrations

Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.5
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Sonnet 3.7
Claude Sonnet 4
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.6
GLM-5.2
GPT-4.1
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-6
Gemini 3 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.1 Pro
OpenAI
Slack
XHawk
Claim Amp and update features and information
Claim Amp and update features and information
Claim Cursor and update features and information
Claim Cursor and update features and information