XmlRpc++ Reviews

User Ratings

3.7 out of 5 stars

★★★★★

★★★★

★★★

★★

★

ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

Rate This Project

Featured Reviews

Highest Rated

Fast, very simple and small, had to port it to windows so there wasn't as much to have to deal with as other libraries, there was some work though. Let me know if anyone needs help getting it working in windows.

Lowest Rated

It doesn't deal with HTTPS i.e. SSL, and the code reimplements a lot of HTTP stuff that's standard in Windows (wininet.lib)

User Reviews

Filter Reviews:

All

robertcorreia Posted 2013-06-04

Xmlrpcpp is excellent! Thanks.

1 user found this review helpful.
tcotco Posted 2012-10-23

It doesn't deal with HTTPS i.e. SSL, and the code reimplements a lot of HTTP stuff that's standard in Windows (wininet.lib)
musicmonkey5555 Posted 2009-09-08

Fast, very simple and small, had to port it to windows so there wasn't as much to have to deal with as other libraries, there was some work though. Let me know if anyone needs help getting it working in windows.

Previous
You're on page 1
Next