Win32++ Icon

User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
29
1
0
0
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    great project

    Posted 05/05/2016
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I just use it. However, for same use, Qt program over 10M, MFC over 5M, but win32++ just for 1.4M.

    Posted 04/11/2016
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good project

    Posted 04/07/2016
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Definitely tremendous work! Smooth & friendly communication with the author! I found a few imperfections in the project anyway: - Bugs in the documentation ("...Docker descended from the to the dock ancestor"). Bugs span from grammar over semantics up to inconsistencies in text. - Documentation could be more elaborated, covering Win32++ in more detail, especially when it comes to more advanced topics. Library reference seems to be ok, but anyway haven't read it all yet. - It's difficult to have all rules of using Win32++ in head during first steps, so better explained examples (with more "redundand" or repetitive code) wouldn't definitely harm the documentation's first sections.

    Posted 10/22/2014
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Cool project, for anyone looking for an MFC alternative

    Posted 10/13/2014
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Great project, highly recommended! Win32++ / MFC reminds me of David vs. Goliath.What a coincidence ;-)

    Posted 10/05/2014
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Good Wrapper for Win32

    Posted 09/04/2014
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Nicely done!

    Posted 08/18/2014
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very good job, i really like it.

    Posted 08/02/2014
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    just great

    Posted 03/23/2014
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good job

    Posted 02/19/2014
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Nice, thank you

    Posted 06/26/2013
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    The best!!!

    Posted 03/16/2013
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Simple to use.

    Posted 02/17/2013
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    win32-framework is fast and easy to use

    Posted 01/20/2013
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good program win32-framework.

    Posted 12/19/2012
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    win32-framework works great

    Posted 11/13/2012
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Reliable and runs smoothly

    Posted 09/15/2012
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    win32-framework works perfectly.

    Posted 03/26/2012
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I compiled the 'Dock' sample project using Visual Studio 6 on Windows 7, it runs ok. But when I try to run it on Windows Server 2003 SP2, it generates a bunch of errors 'The procedure entry point ___CxxFrameHandler3 could not be located in the dynamic link library Msvcrt.dll' and the Window eventually appears correctly. Is this framework really backward compatible? Is it referencing to a newer version of msvcrt.dll?

    Posted 02/08/2012
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Nice framework. I hope that the future release would have optional message mapping macros like those used in ATL and WTL GUI classes or other message and event handling mechanisms aside from using switch statements. Message mapping macros make the code more neat and easier to maintain than a big switch statement especially if there are lots of messages and events that needs to be handled. Big and sometimes nested switch statements tangle the code making maintenance quite difficult and this can be avoided with message mapping macros. Message and event handling methods used in other frameworks like QT and SmartWin++ are also good alternatives to large switch statements. So, I suggest that this framework should have optional message mapping macros or other message and event handling methods making it more suitable for large projects too.

    Posted 07/06/2011
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Great alternative to MFC because it builds 200KB executable instead of 2,000KB for simple MDI Frame based application with icons. Simpler Win32++ apps compile to under 100KB! Nice alternative to WTL for beginners because it builds with more C++ compilers, has nice docs bundled (chm file), and extensive examples that actually compile and run without effort. Hard to believe believe WTL's bundled example projects won't even build using Visual C++ 2008 SP1 Professional as of March 13, 2011. On the other hand, WTL's appwizard is rather nice and works well. Best of all, Win32++ seems to be updated and is constantly improving even though it has reached version 7.0. One missing feature in Win32++ is auto-hide docking panels like Visual Studio 2008 IDE which slide in/out of view. WTL has example projects doing this at CodeProject.com but I've not seen this for Win32++ yet.

    Posted 03/13/2011
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I LOVE THIS!

    Posted 03/04/2011
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thanks for this project, it's sad developers use MFC or Managed code because the lack of Platform SDK documentation and examples. Maybe now they'll be able to write fast and small windows applications. No more hello world creating a 2MB binary :) Keep up the great work!

    Posted 12/16/2010
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very nice and serious work.

    Posted 08/29/2010
Show next 5 reviews

Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.

Screenshot instructions:
Windows
Mac
Red Hat Linux   Ubuntu

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

More information about our ad policies
X

Briefly describe the problem (required):

Upload screenshot of ad (required):
Select a file, or drag & drop file here.

Please provide the ad click URL, if possible:

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

No, thanks