User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
7
0
1
0
1
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 2 / 5

Rate This Project

Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

  • don't support std::fucntion() with c++ 11

  • Thanks for Stlport, it's perfect!

    2 users found this review helpful.
  • Stlport works good.

    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Stlport works perfect.

    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Simple to use.

  • Fast and Standard conforming. Much faster than what MS ships with MSVC. Great for writing portable code for different platforms, including Windows and Linux. A pity that it still lacks support for features from the upcomping C++ standard.

  • I've configured STLPort for my compilers and I've found it to be absolutely marvelous.

  • great stuff! 1. much lesser memory allocations compared to msvc stl 2. more configureable 3. cross-platform

  • Really troublesome to build for some platforms. Team is very reluctant to support embedded windows builds, even through applying community patches.