User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
1
0
0
0
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5

Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

  • Well done. I've followed the evolution of this project with interest but until now haven't felt quite confident enough to commit to its regular use. SES definitely has potential. With the last release, I at last feel the program has come of age and is mature enough for me to begin using it for some more sensitive real-world encryption tasks. Here's hoping SES continues developing in the direction of greater key security, as I believe this is where its major weakness lay. GSES is definitely a big step in the direction of usability and safety. I applaud the concept behind the project and agree with much that the author says in the ReadMe concerning the untrustworthiness of NIST and its alleged NSA bedfellows. Disquieting. Viva crypto-independence!
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • Next