RapidXml Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars

★★★★★

★★★★

★★★

★★

★

ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

Rate This Project

Clean structure, even no docs needed. Easy to integrate - headers only.

Quite buggy! Especially with large buggy XML inputs. No namespace support (WHY?!). I ended up hand-rolling my own expat-based parser.

User Reviews

Filter Reviews:

All

freundt Posted 2012-08-21

Quite buggy! Especially with large buggy XML inputs. No namespace support (WHY?!). I ended up hand-rolling my own expat-based parser.
gmsb Posted 2012-04-26

I have used rapidxml-1.13, and the version 'hidden' inside Boost.PropertyTree. It's simple to operate, and without many lines of code I was able to add XML Namespaces (prefix mapping) support and create a visitor to adapt to a parser-neutral SAX2 interface, so I could change over from another parser.
yodaj Posted 2011-07-11

good job
timurhai Posted 2011-03-15

Clean structure, even no docs needed. Easy to integrate - headers only.