Postgres-XC Icon

User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
4
1
0
0
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Parallel execution is insufficient for some use cases. It leads to deadlock which the application needs to handle. For a legacy application without that handling, the choice of serial execution avoids deadlock. This is exactly the problem I had using HA-JDBC and MariaDB+Galera with parallel execution, but HA-JDBC offered serial write execution as a fallback. I was able to migrate to HA-JDBC right away using serial execution, and I am working towards adding application handling so I can take advantage of HA-JDBC parallel execution for the same write amplification being touted for PosgresXC. If PostgresXC offered the choice of parallel or serial execution, I would love to switch from HA-JDBC.

    Posted 06/18/2014
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Postgres-xc works wonderful.

    Posted 06/10/2013
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Not yet mature (as of Jan 2013) but very promising.

    Posted 01/28/2013
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very good project, at last an real high availability sql server begin to exist.

    Posted 10/14/2012
  • 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Most promising scale-out PostgreSQL clusetr.

    Posted 02/14/2011

Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.

Screenshot instructions:
Windows
Mac
Red Hat Linux   Ubuntu

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

More information about our ad policies
X

Briefly describe the problem (required):

Upload screenshot of ad (required):
Select a file, or drag & drop file here.

Please provide the ad click URL, if possible:

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

No, thanks