User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
1
1
0
0
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5

Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

  • I think it's one of the best Windows-based OS for servers. Yes, the installation is very slow on an HDD but even tho it's not fast I think it's still faster than the original one. Updates bring a lot of functionality to it and it can be used probably on everything due to the low requirements. The commands are easy to use and the interface is simple. If the developer(s) can increase stability and installation speed, it will be the best one. Keep it up!
    Reply from NeuraSys
    Posted 2024-09-24
    Thank you for the great words! I'm still working on fixing the slow installation on HDDs, but it's quite a difficult task and I don't have time to fix it while still releasing stable, regular updates. Stability should be much better from the next version, but that's still a secret ;) Thank you, for checking out NeuraSys
  • It's a very conveinent and easy to use variant of Windows. The commands are very straight-forward and easy to use too. However, on HDDs it runs very poorly, an SSD is HIGHLY recommended if the developer can't fix it. Other than that, I think it turned out very great, running servers is very great, due to the fact that you can open multiple instances and the system requirements are very low. I can't wait for future updates.
    Reply from NeuraSys
    Posted 2024-09-01
    Thank you so much for reviewing my operating system. Yes, I'm working on fixing the HDD problem, but It has already consumed a lot of my time, and as a solo developer It's hard to keep it updated. I'm happy, that you've tried it, I hope you'll keep using it. Again, thank you so much and have a great day or evening! -cl9s4bl3
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • Next