| Name | Modified | Size | Downloads / Week |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent folder | |||
| JadeEncryption-1.1.1.zip | < 22 hours ago | 139.8 kB | |
| SharpAESCrypt.dll | < 22 hours ago | 39.9 kB | |
| JadeEncryption.exe | < 22 hours ago | 149.0 kB | |
| Jade Encryption 1.1.1 source code.tar.gz | < 23 hours ago | 144.0 kB | |
| Jade Encryption 1.1.1 source code.zip | < 23 hours ago | 154.9 kB | |
| README.md | < 23 hours ago | 3.5 kB | |
| Totals: 6 Items | 631.1 kB | 0 | |
Jade Encryption v1.1.1 — Revival Maintenance Release
This update brings Jade Encryption back to life after several years of inactivity.
Version 1.1.1 focuses on cleanup, stability, and preparing the project for future development.
Changes
- Updated project name and website references
- Removed outdated Bitcoin-related components
- General code cleanup and minor improvements
- Added SharpAESCrypt DLL as a temporary AES implementation
Dependency Notice
SharpAESCrypt is included only as a DLL to avoid licensing issues.
It will be removed in v1.1.2 and replaced with a fully custom, modern encryption engine.
Roadmap
A major rewrite is planned for Version 2.0, featuring:
- A modern, more secure encryption backend
- Selectable ciphers
- Expanded configuration options
- Cleaner architecture and improved maintainability
Development continues once sufficient ham has been consumed.
Legacy Notes (2016 → 2026)
Password Storage Conspiracies
- Jade Encryption has never stored passwords inside encrypted files.
- Not in 2015 Not in 2016. Not in 2026.
- The only exception was corry — the NSA insisted I decrypt his secret admirer’s message.
(Relax, this is a joke. Please don’t grab your hex editor.)
The AES‑256 Incident
- Yes, the original version used AES‑256.
- No, I didn’t write that in the README.
- Yes, that caused an entire conspiracy theory thread.
- I still remember it because I went to bed with a headache that lasted until about 2015.
.NET Framework Drama
- Jade Encryption required .NET Framework 4.5.
- I said this clearly.
- People still tried to run it on 4.0 and complained it was broken.
- Sadly, even in 2026, it still doesn’t support .NET 4.0.
- Might as well complain it doesn’t run on .NET 1.1 while you’re at it.
XP Users in 2016
- People were encrypting files on Windows XP in 2016.
- And complaining about security.
- My brother in Christ, XP itself is the plaintext.
Kryptel (???)
- To this day, I still have no idea what Kryptel is.
- Someone tried very hard to advertise it in the comments.
- I assume those posts were deleted.
- Probably all one person.
- Good luck to them.
The “This Was Actually Made in 2009” Conspiracy
- Someone once claimed Jade Encryption was secretly from 2009 and they had “solid evidence.”
- Not quite sure how a 2009 program is supposed to run on .NET Framework 4.5.
- Maybe they had a buddy at Microsoft backporting the runtime for them.
Shoutouts
- Thanks to ew, the only person in that entire thread who actually understood encryption.
- Thanks to Dave, who tested the software and said “works fine” while everyone else was reenacting a cryptographic soap opera.
- Dave — mate — I really hope you're not still using TrueCrypt in 2026
TrueCrypt / VeraCrypt
- TrueCrypt was fab.
- VeraCrypt is still fab.
- Use those for full‑disk encryption.
- Jade Encryption is just a simple file encryptor — nothing mystical, nothing stored in the file, no hidden passwords, no DOS magic.
Final Note
- 9 years later, Jade Encryption still does what it was meant to do.
- And the passwords are still not stored in the file.
Project Info
Website: https://jessicaamy.com
Contact: contact@jessicaamy.com
© 2026 Jessica Amy — Licensed under GNU GPL v3