From: Gerald F. <ger...@fr...> - 2006-10-31 21:26:46
|
yawfle wrote: > That improved things dramatically for several sounds I tested. Now I'm > kicking myself for not staring at your patches a a little harder, since > even I might have been smart enough to eventually realize legato > doesn't need to be "punchy", especially with your comments about the > likelihood of extra code being left in the function. Oh well, thanks > for doing all the work. :) Hehe :) > Incidentally, attached is a sound patch that showed the most improvement > of all the ones I compared; it still pops and clicks, but it was > virtually unplayable before, with the "punchy-ness" clipping the > outputs. It might make a good test case for any further hacking in this > direction. Ok, thanks, I'll keep it for testing. -- Gerald Folcher - geraldf2 (at) free (dot) fr |