|
From: Albertas A. <al...@co...> - 2002-01-16 09:07:11
|
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:17:59PM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote: > However, Leo's design was that TestRunner would acquire an > interface from the ZODB in good Zope tradition. Do you disagree > to this approach? Do you mean that TestRunner would acquire some object that would define its presentation? Or do you mean that TestRunner would have TTW-manageable presentation (DTML for now) methods? > As neither of us is devoting too much time to ZUnit right now > (for reasons of job priorities mostly), perhaps you'd like to > have CVS write access? In good Wiki tradition, CVS is a > wonderful thing because if we don't like your patch, we can > revoke it ;-) Cool :-) I gladly accept. My Sourceforge username is albagj. Albertas |