Re: [Zopexmlmethods-devel] Privatizing XSLTProcessor.addParam

[Brent H. <br...@ec...>]

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> +1

[snip]

> Craeg Strong wrote:
> 
>> +1
>>
>> --Craeg
>>
>>
>>> How would you guys feel about moving the calls to addParam() inside 
>>> transformGuts() so that what gets passed to the XSL Processor is just 
>>> a dictionary of parameters?  Then each processor can do whatever 
>>> manipulations are necessary to get the parameters into a digestible 
>>> format.  There doesn't seem to me to be a need to expose that 
>>> implementation detail to XSLTMethod (or the rest of the world).

Having received a thumbs up from the other developers on the list, all 2 
of you :), I went ahead and modified my patch to do this.  You can find 
it at http://thehendricks.org/zxmlmethods/zxmlmethods-request-patch-v3. 
    This includes the updated unit tests and CHANGES.txt file.  If there 
are no last objections, I will commit it, since I see that I have CVS 
access now (thanks!)

--Brent