Menu
▾
▴
znc-users — General ZNC related discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 16:13:41
|
Feature Requests item #2999718, was opened at 2010-05-11 05:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2999718&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: AwayMessage Initial Comment: I noticed that IsIRCAway() has been added to the svn version of ZNC. It would be nice to have access to the away message without catching the user setting themself away (or being set away) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 17:13 Message: IRC doesn't really give you the away reason easily, sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2010-06-19 13:25 Message: Dunno, do we really need sth like that? Catching the user's away message isn't needed anymore and there isn't a good answer to /away from the server... :/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2999718&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 16:12:54
|
Feature Requests item #2978647, was opened at 2010-03-29 17:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2978647&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Engine Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Martin Martimeo (martimeo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: New ZNC function --maketcl Initial Comment: Loading the tcl module requires the modtcl.tcl file. It would be better to have them at ~, so each user can have his own modtcl file. With znc --maketcl, the modtcl,tcl could be copied to ~/.znc and add the LoadModule entry at znc.conf, so no more search for the modtcl file :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 17:12 Message: Would be nice, but I don't think this is going to happen any time soon. No one seems to really care about modtcl lately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2978647&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 16:11:31
|
Feature Requests item #2956480, was opened at 2010-02-22 10:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2956480&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: BlockIP Initial Comment: Block incoming IP addresses. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 17:11 Message: Sure, will do. /me points at fail2ban and wanders away (sorry, that is all we can offer right now) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Date: 2010-02-27 00:08 Message: For a while, an unknown person was trying to access my installation. I don't think it was an attack, as they never sent a user:pass. I know it wasn't a user, and I blocked their IP with the firewall. I know that you can block people from logging in if their ip isnt in the user's config, but there also should be a way to block specific IPs before they ever get to the login, like fail2ban does, but to do it manually, like a zline on irc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2010-02-22 11:12 Message: Sorry, what? Could you elaborate? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2956480&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 16:10:24
|
Feature Requests item #2956464, was opened at 2010-02-22 09:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2956464&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Partyline Whois, ISON Initial Comment: Partyline is missing WHOIS, ISON. I failed rather spectacularly at adding this on my own. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 17:10 Message: Sorry, but partyline isn't meant to be a full-fledged IRCd. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2010-08-06 19:34 Message: SCString FindChannels(const CString& sNick) { SCString ssRet; for (set<CPartylineChannel*>::iterator it = m_ssChannels.begin(); it != m_ssChannels.end(); ++it) { if ((*it)->IsInChannel(sNick)) ssRet.insert((*it)->GetName(); } return ssRet; } This code is untested and written ad-hoc. No idea if it even compiles, but it should show the general idea. } ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Date: 2010-08-06 05:03 Message: I may have added this. In this case, I have the beginnings of a module (whois on other users), but I don't know how to figure out what partyline channels a user is on. If someone could help me out with this, I would appreciate it. I hope to add ISON before I go back to school. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2956464&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 16:09:25
|
Feature Requests item #2954310, was opened at 2010-02-18 17:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2954310&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Un1matr1x (un1matr1x) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Webadmin - Homepage Initial Comment: Hi, on the Home-Tab/Page of the Webadmin their's much space that's unused as you can see: http://img17.yfrog.com/i/zncwebadmhome.png/ This space might be filled with the motd or additional news, setable via the settings-tab/page best regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 17:09 Message: I want unicorns in that space! Sorry, but webadmin does its job quite good right now and the MOTD is send to clients when they log in via irc (and znc is still all about irc, not http/www). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2954310&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 16:07:43
|
Feature Requests item #2942730, was opened at 2010-01-30 09:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2942730&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Log may invisible for users? Initial Comment: Hi! One of my users had a lot of traffic, so I decided to log his messages. The module itself works great, but it may be invisible for users, I mean if they really share bad stuff via my server they won't tell me, so I have to log their messages. But every user can see if logging is enabled and is allowed to turn it off. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 17:07 Message: DenyLoadModule and be done? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2010-01-30 12:10 Message: Well some functions are only aviliable for admins, I don't need a cpmplete user management system, just a little fix so users cant use that function. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Un1matr1x (un1matr1x) Date: 2010-01-30 09:51 Message: Your Tracker fits to: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2924789&group_id=115828&atid=672824 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2917172&group_id=115828&atid=672824 what's about userregulations, groups, rightsmanagment - so the idea is here - but someone how can make the code-changes is needed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2942730&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 16:06:27
|
Feature Requests item #2917172, was opened at 2009-12-18 19:26 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2917172&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Un1matr1x (un1matr1x) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: webadmin Initial Comment: additianly to "Webadmin edit config file manually - ID: 2859761" http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2859761 If you're working on web-admin, might it be possible to give the admin more rights what a user can change and what he cann't? f.e. I've got a thrust only on one IRC-network and some znc-users on a other network, so if one of the users from the network with thrust chances to an other network I might risk a gline/kill caused through "TOO MANY CONNECTIONS FROM YOUR HOSTNAME " Also I'd like to have f.e. fix settings for Quit-MSG Playback Buffer Size (default & singel channels) Join Tries Max Joins CTCP Replies Realname Status Prefix best regards & sry 4 my bad english Un1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 17:06 Message: Yet another dupe of the "more control over users" bug. Adding a DenyFoo option for every config option Foo isn't going to happen and no one came up with a better idea yet. This means that quite some large-ish parts of znc would have to be changed for this which no one currently has the time to do, sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2917172&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 16:04:59
|
Feature Requests item #2859766, was opened at 2009-09-16 06:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2859766&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Change ConnectDelay on the fly via irc Initial Comment: I'm not sure how many users the average znc admin has, but I've got 300 right now, and I would find at least one of the following very useful: 1. A command to change the connectdelay in the main status module? 2. A command to bypass the delay so as to make certain users (or even just the current user) connect immediately 3. A BypassConnectDelay user config item ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 17:04 Message: Sorry, not going to happen in the near future. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2009-09-17 15:28 Message: Hi, 1. Sounds like a good idea (but perhaps I'd do it in the admin module, dunno) 2. More or less possible, but if the ispoof file is currently in use by some other user this command is bound to fail. With 300 users I'd expect you to have a quite low ConnectDelay which means your ISpoofFile will be locked quite often. 3. No idea how to sanely implement this. Basically this would mean that when you start ZNC, all these users connect at the same time. That wouldn't be too funny... Oh and no idea how to sanely code this either. :/ For that ConnectDelay change: Rehash does read the new value from znc.conf, but connecting users is handled via a timer and that timer isn't restarted on rehash. I'll understand this as a bug report and make rehash restart the timer (after the next release) psychon psychon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Date: 2009-09-16 09:02 Message: The connectdelay option in the config is also not updating when I rehash the config; I started out with it set to 600 seconds, and even though I've since changed it to 30, my adminlog log still only shows one connection every 10 minutes or so I assume the delay IS in seconds, not minutes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2859766&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 16:03:11
|
Feature Requests item #2855716, was opened at 2009-09-10 04:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2855716&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Engine Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 4 Private: No Submitted By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: starttls, anyone? Initial Comment: I love the single port for webadmin/irc connections. Would it be possible to implement starttls for ZNC so we can use the same port for plaintext and ssl connections? Maybe what I'm thinking of is protoctl. I'm not quite clear on the difference between the two. Regardless, it would be nice not to have to specify a port. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 17:03 Message: Not going to happen, sorry. STARTTLS by itself is insecure because an attacker could just pretend that the other side doesn't know STARTTLS and so he gets the plain text traffic. This means when STARTTLS is enabled, the client has to reject talking plain text. At this point, you get nothing from STARTTLS which plain old SSL (or rather TLS) doesn't get you, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2010-02-27 08:49 Message: FYI, it might be possible to do "proper" SSL (without STARTTLS) and plain text on the same port. But don't expect too much too soon. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Date: 2009-09-16 05:46 Message: Oh well :( Thanks for explaining it, at least. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2009-09-10 08:03 Message: Hi, First some basics: "classic" SSL like ZNC uses it: Some client connects and you immediately start with an SSL handshake. There is no way (afaik) to do port sharing between encrypted and unencrypted ports here. STARTTLS like it is most famous from IMAP: You start with an unencrypted connections and (with IMAP) the server tells you that it supports the STARTTLS command (an attacker could remove this "I support this" message - it's not protected by ssl after all!). You then send the STARTTLS command and an ssl handshake starts afterwards. Since the connection starts unencrypted and STARTTLS is then negotiated, you can use this port both encrypted and unencrypted. I'm not sure if there is a STARTTLS extension for HTTP (I don't think so), but for IRC there is this (which requires CAP, another protocol extension that ZNC doesn't support): http://wiki.inspircd.org/STARTTLS_Documentation With this protocol extension we could do webadmin, irc and irc+ssl on the same port, *if* the client supports STARTTLS (afaik only one client does), but I bet this would confuse people even more since they'd wonder why we can't do some starttls-like thingie for HTTP. and PROTOCTL is something different again. ;) It's an IRC protocol extension, too, but it's only used after the authentication phase while CAP is used before. So I don't think this will happen any time soon, sorry. :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2855716&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 16:01:04
|
Feature Requests item #2845413, was opened at 2009-08-27 09:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2845413&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Ola (olaormse) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Playback buffers should also include privmsg Initial Comment: To my horror I found out that queries/privmsg is not being buffered in the playback buffer. This could lead to me missing the next middle aged hairy guy posing as a 20 year old oh-so-bored college co-ed that wants to have some online fun. And I can't have none of that! So please add support for buffering privmsg as well, It will make my life so much more exciting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 17:01 Message: Uhm, queries/privmsgs *are* buffer in the playbacker buffer (unless some module interferes which AFAIK only away does). Oo ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Date: 2009-12-16 22:08 Message: away only keeps messages sent while you're away. If you log off suddenly, that may only be a partial conversation. I don't have this problem--I was just thinking of a reason... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tyr (thespiritof69) Date: 2009-08-31 20:48 Message: How about away.so? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2845413&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:59:55
|
Feature Requests item #2849667, was opened at 2009-09-03 05:19 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2849667&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Engine Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Advanced logging and scroll back Initial Comment: Log all channels and private messages to a DB such as SQLlite or MySQL as an option. - change buffer feature so that it only plays back messages for the last x min instead of number of lines. This would be much more useful in slow rooms. - implement a full text search feature - store x days of logs - search for all messages from a specific nick - / command to play back a specific amount of log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:59 Message: http://en.znc.in/wiki/MySQL_Log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David (bagobones) Date: 2010-02-16 20:59 Message: I would really like this seeing that ZNC sits in rooms all day.. I could see using this to do scroll-back only when needed or a semi smart scroll-back based on a time when connecting to channels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2849667&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:52:57
|
Feature Requests item #2845167, was opened at 2009-08-26 22:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2845167&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Ola (olaormse) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Capture playback also on away and disconnect. Initial Comment: My use case: I have a client (irssi) running all the time in a screen session. This client is connected to my znc. When I leave my desk I set my irssi to be away and I normally start using Colloquy Mobile or some other local client on the mobile platform that I use. When this mobile client connects I want it to get a playback of what has happened in all channels and queries since I sat my last client away or disconnected. Yes, I COULD get almost what I want by just using Keep Buffer, but that generates way too much noise and eats precious cellphone bandwith (ok, I do not pay my own phone bill, but some people do..). So what I really like to see in znc is: * When any one client sets itself away recording to the playback buffer begins even if clients are still connected. * When any one client disconnects recording to the playback buffer begins ven if there are other clients connected. * When any one client connects and there is a buffer present the buffer is played back to that client, and that client only. Depending on the keep buffer setting the buffer is deleted. * When that client disconnects or sets itself away recording to the buffer begins again. * And thus the days fly by. This is something I would REALLY appreciate. If the developer that implements this drops by Halden, Norway please tell oo on EFNet so he can buy you beer :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:52 Message: Just set KeepBuffer = true and (optionally) load the clearbufferonmsg module, that's as close to this as you can get with current znc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2845167&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:52:00
|
Feature Requests item #2797124, was opened at 2009-05-27 02:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2797124&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lastseen time/ip Initial Comment: Would it be possible to store/display the last seen connecting IP address for a user as well as the last time they logged in? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:51 Message: Just stop spying on your users. :P (Load adminlog and AFAIK you'll get the IP) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2009-05-30 11:34 Message: Why are you interested in a user's last IP? for what do you need this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2797124&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:51:11
|
Feature Requests item #2797090, was opened at 2009-05-26 23:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2797090&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: partyline message buffer Initial Comment: Can we get the buffer to include messages from the partyline channels & users? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:51 Message: No ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2797090&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:50:42
|
Feature Requests item #2797089, was opened at 2009-05-26 23:43 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2797089&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lastseen/idle times Initial Comment: I know lastseen works based on the last time a user logged in/out. Would it be possible to add a separate table in there for the last time a user sent a message, whether over the partyline or to irc? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:50 Message: Doesn't look like this is going to happen. Also, the last time a user sent a message isn't really that helpful (e.g. replying to a CTCP VERSION already counts as sending a message), sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2009-06-03 12:40 Message: Uhm, do you really have users who log in to their znc account but dont actually use it? I'd really expect both times do be quite close to each other. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2797089&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:49:47
|
Feature Requests item #2792655, was opened at 2009-05-16 14:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2792655&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Savebuff without join/part/mode etc. Initial Comment: Having an option to exclude join, part, mode, nick changes and kicks from the safebuff module would be great. It would also make a separation of feature more clear as there already is a module to do this job (buffextras). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:49 Message: Fixed in r1691, I think. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2009-05-24 13:34 Message: Because it means losing saved buffer on restart of ZNC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2009-05-20 16:05 Message: Uhm... just dont load the savebuff module then? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2792655&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:48:46
|
Feature Requests item #2788616, was opened at 2009-05-07 22:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2788616&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: DerGrinch (dergrinch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: stickychan should check for error-messages Initial Comment: Hey, it would maybe be good if stickychan checks for error-messages (like channel is inviteonly, channel has a key etc.) to prevent it from joining in infinite loop. this causes lot of spam if the user gets disconnected from the IRC-server and is currently away from the computer for a longer time. Also, my stickychan sometimes didn't get it to sent the channel-password. unfortunately, this happens randomly and I don't know what to do to reproduce this, so this is just a note and I'll not file a bug report. Greets, DerGrinch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:48 Message: Sorry, there is no proper way in IRC to find out when a channel join didn't work (random IRCd add random new numerics with random new meanings). If a channel doesn't like you, don't add it to stickychan. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2788616&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:47:09
|
Feature Requests item #2788178, was opened at 2009-05-07 04:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2788178&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Engine Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: User Levels Initial Comment: It would be nice have a levels system that enabled/disabled control of everything from running certain commands in the status module to loading certain modules like webadmin to shutting down the bouncer altogether. Something similar to the access levels in Anope IRC services. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:47 Message: A dupe of the "user group" bugs and all the "I want DenyFoo" ones. Sorry, but no one is going to do all the work that would be needed to add this to znc right now. We know this wish exists and we don't have the time to do anything about it, sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tyr (thespiritof69) Date: 2009-07-06 08:52 Message: Would also like to be able to have more control over what users are permitted to do and what not and what settings they may change on their account (forbid user to change ident, realname,server for example) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2788178&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:45:31
|
Feature Requests item #2788174, was opened at 2009-05-07 04:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2788174&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Partyline modes Initial Comment: It would be nice if there were some way of only allowing admin users to speak in the partyline channels. As far as I can tell, the easiest way to do this would be to implement a channelmode framework with at least mode +m and possibly +O ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:45 Message: Sorry, not going to implement a IRCd inside ZNC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2788174&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:44:18
|
Feature Requests item #2782230, was opened at 2009-04-27 17:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2782230&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: auto-attach on watch match Initial Comment: It would be great if I could be re-attached to a channel based on some watch output; this would show me the buffer (and context) of where the reference I was watching came from. In addition, I typically only care about being re-attached to the channel when something I'm watching is mentioned, not have a special message sent to me when something I already highlight in my IRC client happens (which is commonly the same as my watch list). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:44 Message: Yeah, this would be great to have, but I don't expect this to happen any time soon, sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Douglas E. Warner (silfreed) Date: 2009-04-27 17:40 Message: Sorry; wasn't logged in when I submitted it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2782230&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:42:21
|
Feature Requests item #2707697, was opened at 2009-03-24 00:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2707697&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Switch to overall disable playback buffers per user Initial Comment: It would be nice to have an admin switch/flag/boolean to overall allow/prevent using playback buffers for each user (like permanently setting Buffer = 0, without change rights for non-admin-users). Suggestion: DenyUseBuffer - If set to true the user can not use playback buffers at all. Overrides KeepBuffer and Buffers in User and Chan definitions. Is set to false by default. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:42 Message: Sorry, we aren't going to add DenyFoo settings for every setting Foo. Let's wait until someone finally starts writing something more "proper" for this. :/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2707697&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:41:03
|
Feature Requests item #2506597, was opened at 2009-01-14 09:47 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2506597&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Highlight Initial Comment: A Feature wenn an user say your nick if the BNC is Offline when im gone Online i see that Nick and MSG this Feature gives in SBNC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:41 Message: Sorry, we are lazy idiots. :-( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2009-01-19 06:33 Message: hm Is not what im search When a User my Nickname Write in a Chan and im Offline and gone Online im see that Nick to write my nick this Module watch specifed a User and logs the Text from this user to an special Query ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2009-01-14 13:35 Message: tried the watch module yet? /msg *watch add * *highlight *yournick* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2506597&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:40:27
|
Feature Requests item #2387499, was opened at 2008-12-04 09:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2387499&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Engine Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Gregor W. (gregor_w) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add logging Initial Comment: As I already mentioned in my ZNC review "Useful and stable with a but" (https://www.ohloh.net/p/5902/reviews) I really like this piece of software. However, it has one big problem for me while I'm using it. I need more information what ZNC is going on. >From my point of view it's important for all daemons to do some logging. It would be great to have some "I still alive" log entries but much more important are information like "IRC Server XY closed connection" or "ZNC started". With such information I know what happened at any time and can be sure that not ZNC is the problem but rather the IRC network or or the other way around. By the way, there are a lot of ready to use logging frameworks - so have a look. And for information: I asked already the question if ZNC has some logging abilities and the only answer I got was something like: "You can use ZNC in debug mode". This isn't really an option - sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:40 Message: IMHO we got enough kind-of-logging with adminlog and log, sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gregor W. (gregor_w) Date: 2008-12-14 17:34 Message: Ok I just installed Adminlog. It works fine and I think it could help me with my problems. However, I still hope that ZNC get syslog logging. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-12-05 19:07 Message: Ignore the description and just try it. E.g. it also logs 'ERROR' lines from the server. It is true however that this module doesnt log all of the useful stuff... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gregor W. (gregor_w) Date: 2008-12-05 17:49 Message: > http://en.znc.in/wiki/Adminlog As I read it from the description this module only log the (failed) log in of users. This isn't really useful if you're searching the problem of a disconnect or familiar things. > http://en.znc.in/wiki/Log This is about conversation logging - nothing to do with my request :-). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-12-04 17:13 Message: Take a look at this module, it might help you (at least a little): http://en.znc.in/wiki/Adminlog And if you want your conversations logged: http://en.znc.in/wiki/Log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2387499&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:38:34
|
Feature Requests item #2008776, was opened at 2008-07-02 14:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2008776&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Ignore hostmask / pattern Initial Comment: when connecting to a user with multiple clients, moving the /ignore to a module in the bouncer would be very helpful. then only the bouncer needs configuring and not all clients that are used. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:38 Message: /silence is the best reply I got for this, sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Efreak (efreakbnc) Date: 2009-05-27 02:51 Message: Most (if not all) IRCds already have a server-side ignore. Look at the command /silence for more info. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=2008776&group_id=115828 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-02-15 15:38:10
|
Feature Requests item #1913976, was opened at 2008-03-14 02:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psychon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=1913976&group_id=115828 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Tro (troworld) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Rate-limit buffer replay Initial Comment: It would be nice to be able to rate-limit the buffer replay upon connecting to the bouncer. It would allow xchat and the like to process incoming messages without freezing the UI and would be easier on my shell provider. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Psychon (psychon) Date: 2011-02-15 16:38 Message: rate-limiting the buffer replay would mean we have to do complicated stuff when new messages come in. I'd rather not go through this. Can't the xchat people fix their IRC client instead? :-P ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=672824&aid=1913976&group_id=115828 |
1 message has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
