Re: [Ziproxy-users] Xinetd or init.d - Simple question - guessing not a simple answer.

[Andrew L. <al...@gm...>]

Hi, if you have more than a handful of users/connections then run ziproxy
as a persistent service (init.d) rather than spawned per connection from
xinet.d

Andrew | eResearch | UWS


On 7 October 2013 01:48, Paul Simons <pau...@on...> wrote:

>  All,
>
> Ziproxy on a CentOS box.
>
> Which is better running it under Xinet.d or Init.d? Bonuses and
> disadvantages of each?
>
> I understand the security of both but the ‘load’ under each would interest
> me if anyone has any experience of both
>
> Regards
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail (and any attachments to it) is confidential and
> intended solely for the named person/s to whom it is addressed. If you are
> not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete the
> email from your system. Any review, dissemination or other use of it in
> these circumstances is prohibited.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> October Webinars: Code for Performance
> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most
> from
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Ziproxy-users mailing list
> Zip...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ziproxy-users
>
>