Re: [Zero-install-devel] 0install 2.6-rc2

[Thomas L. <ta...@gm...>]

On 14 January 2014 22:51, Anders F Björklund <af...@us...> wrote:
> Thomas Leonard wrote:
>
>>>> I've built new binaries (2.6-rc3) against upstream openssl and
>>>> libcurl, so hopefully untainted by Debian or Fedora craziness. Anyway,
>>>> the symbol versions seem to be gone :-)
>>>
>>> Hmm, this still doesn't work for me:
>>>
>>> $ 0install run --not-before=2.6-rc3 http://0install.net/tools/0install.xml
>>> /home/tim/.cache/0install.net/implementations/sha256new_XBH32RLRWOXKRBDE7RA4L357CHREDW4FHU6BMZWB3F465S3RQQOA/files/0install:
>>> error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.1.0.0: cannot open
>>> shared object file: No such file or directory
>>>
>>> ldd still reports:
>>>
>>>    libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => not found
>>>    libssl.so.1.0.0 => not found
>>>
>>> If you've built against the upstream libssl, doesn't that mean you
>>> need to depend on upstream-named .so files as well?
>>
>> Yes. It's not a complete solution, but it does
>>
>> a) make it possible to run on Fedora (with the symlink hack)
>> b) get rid of the warning on Arch
>>
>> Since nothing depends on the OCaml feed currently, I think we can
>> still release this as 2.6. Distributions can include it and build
>> their own binaries. Then we can try to figure out some dynamic linker
>> tricks to make the binaries generic for 2.7 (or static link openssl,
>> though I'd prefer to avoid that).
>
> I think there are some licensing issues when mixing GPL and OpenSSL,
> since the licenses aren't compatible - but there is an exception
> with the "system" openssl, which means the dynamically linked one.
> Including any funky naming schemes, like "1.1.0e" or "10" or so...
>
> So I think we need to build RPMS*, should also fix RHEL6's glibc-2.12 ?
>
> I uploaded a 2.6-rc3 binary for OS X ("darwin") now, as well as the
> two for GNU ("linux") already there. It requires glib/gtk+ and gnupg,
> but fortunately both openssl and libcurl are provided by the system.
> The rest can be added by just installing my PyGTK.pkg and GnuPG.pkg.
>
> Upgraded to OCaml 4.01.0 and OPAM 1.1.0 first, before building it...
>
> --anders
>
>
> * Both EPEL 6 and Fedora 20 are currently shipping 0install-2.3.3
>   as "zeroinstall-injector". We need a new .spec, for 0install-2.6!

Yeah, but let's wait a bit... I'm still finding bugs! Looks like
OpenSUSE has an incompatible version of PackageKit... probably the
others do too...


-- 
Dr Thomas Leonard        http://0install.net/
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6  8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA  BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA