From: Kevin J. <ke...@in...> - 2009-08-17 17:26:24
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Aug 17, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Ron wrote: > Me and one of my co-op students were looking at some of our web apps > to > get fingerprints. Specifically, we were looking at "Secunia". The > issue > with Secunia is that all the files are very generic ("left- > border.gif", > "default.css", etc). While each file is generic, the combination of > them > is likely unique. > > But that made me realize, are your signatures intended to be ANDed or > ORed? Right now, I implemented it with an OR -- if any one signature > matches, it's a match. Implementing it as an AND, where all files must > be present, would be somewhat more difficult. > > Which way do you suggest? The plan so far was to OR them, but I can see the need for an AND. We need to think about the architecture of the fingerprints... for example some of them are on a default port outside of 80. Maybe we could put multiple fingerprints on a line for ANDs? ideas? Kevin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkqJkqkACgkQGDcWptZ2zmRoogCdG28lSqXofEoWb08OQxlfU3nP Me0AniMZjrQLHk7Hj6MF3WMIVtr8ypkH =lRYm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |