From: Petr P. <pp...@re...> - 2017-02-13 15:42:19
|
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 03:58:33PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > Because i686 allows unaliagned access, I think a problem could be the signed > integer overflow in get_num() at C/scanner.c:567: > Even though this is a bug, it does not seem to be the cause of the access to illegal address. Building with -fwrapv experiences the same access to illegal address. -- Petr |