From: Jason S. <sh...@vm...> - 2009-09-29 16:38:00
|
1. In "The list of known errors in this specification is available at http://yaml.org/spec/1.2/errata.html. Please report errors in this document to the yaml-core mailing list." The yaml-core mailing list link needs to be the same yaml-core mailing list link 3 paragraphs above. 2. Example 7.1 has example YAML in a box labeled "%YAML 1.2". The use of A and B anchors and comments does not match the legend to the left. It should be clear to the authors the cut-n-past typos from example 6.29. |
From: Oren Ben-K. <or...@be...> - 2009-09-30 05:33:16
|
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 09:37 -0700, Jason Schroeder wrote: > 1. In "The list of known errors in this specification is available at http://yaml.org/spec/1.2/errata.html. Please report errors in this document to the yaml-core mailing list." > > The yaml-core mailing list link needs to be the same yaml-core mailing list link 3 paragraphs above. > > 2. Example 7.1 has example YAML in a box labeled "%YAML 1.2". > > The use of A and B anchors and comments does not match the legend to the left. Intentionally. The two documents are equivalent even though they use different anchors. Anchors are a presentation detail (like styles, and comments, etc.) and need not be preserved. Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki |
From: Jason S. <sh...@vm...> - 2009-09-30 06:17:46
|
Yeah, right, they are the same. Under what mapping. Hashcode order? Or top to down? Or evaluation order? Others might benefit from clarity in an example, rather than capricious ordering, and name changing. ________________________________________ From: Jason Schroeder Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:37 AM To: yam...@li... Subject: Minor typos in the 1.2 spec 1. In "The list of known errors in this specification is available at http://yaml.org/spec/1.2/errata.html. Please report errors in this document to the yaml-core mailing list." The yaml-core mailing list link needs to be the same yaml-core mailing list link 3 paragraphs above. 2. Example 7.1 has example YAML in a box labeled "%YAML 1.2". The use of A and B anchors and comments does not match the legend to the left. It should be clear to the authors the cut-n-past typos from example 6.29. |
From: Oren Ben-K. <or...@be...> - 2009-09-30 06:30:30
|
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 23:17 -0700, Jason Schroeder wrote: > Yeah, right, they are the same. > > Under what mapping. Hashcode order? Or top to down? Or evaluation order? Anchors are used in the order they appear in the stream; they need to be defined before they are used (the "first" instance is anchored and the "following" instances alias it). If an anchor is redefined, following instances refer to the last definition. It is all covered in the spec... Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki |